Comparison of the biomechanical properties of a ventral cervical intervertebral anchored fusion device with locking plate fixation applied to cadaveric canine cervical spines

Schöllhorn, Bernhard; Bürki, Alexander; Stahl, Christina; Howard, J.; Forterre, Franck (2013). Comparison of the biomechanical properties of a ventral cervical intervertebral anchored fusion device with locking plate fixation applied to cadaveric canine cervical spines. Veterinary surgery, 42(7), pp. 825-831. Wiley-Blackwell 10.1111/j.1532-950X.2013.12044.x

[img] Text
vsu12044.pdf - Published Version
Restricted to registered users only
Available under License Publisher holds Copyright.

Download (522kB) | Request a copy

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate fixation properties of a new intervertebral anchored fusion device and compare these with ventral locking plate fixation. STUDY DESIGN: In vitro biomechanical evaluation. ANIMALS: Cadaveric canine C4-C7 cervical spines (n = 9). METHODS: Cervical spines were nondestructively loaded with pure moments in a nonconstraining testing apparatus to induce flexion/extension while angular motion was measured. Range of motion (ROM) and neutral zone (NZ) were calculated for (1) intact specimens, (2) specimens after discectomy and fixation with a purpose-built intervertebral fusion cage with integrated ventral fixation, and (3) after removal of the device and fixation with a ventral locking plate. RESULTS: Both fixation techniques resulted in a decrease in ROM and NZ (P < .001) compared with the intact segments. There were no significant differences between the anchored spacer and locking plate fixation. CONCLUSION: An anchored spacer appears to provide similar biomechanical stability to that of locking plate fixation.

Item Type:

Journal Article (Original Article)

Division/Institute:

05 Veterinary Medicine > Research Foci > NeuroCenter
04 Faculty of Medicine > Pre-clinic Human Medicine > Institute for Surgical Technology & Biomechanics ISTB [discontinued]
05 Veterinary Medicine > Department of Clinical Veterinary Medicine (DKV)
05 Veterinary Medicine > Department of Clinical Veterinary Medicine (DKV) > Small Animal Clinic > Small Animal Clinic, Surgery
05 Veterinary Medicine > Department of Clinical Veterinary Medicine (DKV) > DKV - Clinical Radiology
05 Veterinary Medicine > Department of Clinical Veterinary Medicine (DKV) > DKV - Central Clinical Laboratory
05 Veterinary Medicine > Department of Clinical Veterinary Medicine (DKV) > Small Animal Clinic

UniBE Contributor:

Schöllhorn, Bernhard, Bürki, Alexander, Precht, Maria Christina, Howard, Judith, Forterre, Franck

Subjects:

600 Technology > 610 Medicine & health

ISSN:

0161-3499

Publisher:

Wiley-Blackwell

Language:

English

Submitter:

Simone Forterre

Date Deposited:

05 Mar 2014 13:17

Last Modified:

02 Mar 2023 23:23

Publisher DOI:

10.1111/j.1532-950X.2013.12044.x

PubMed ID:

24033669

BORIS DOI:

10.7892/boris.40380

URI:

https://boris.unibe.ch/id/eprint/40380

Actions (login required)

Edit item Edit item
Provide Feedback