Action crisis and cost–benefit thinking: A cognitive analysis of a goal-disengagement phase

Brandstätter, Veronika; Schüler, Julia (2013). Action crisis and cost–benefit thinking: A cognitive analysis of a goal-disengagement phase. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 49(3), pp. 543-553. Elsevier 10.1016/j.jesp.2012.10.004

Text Brandstätter_Schüler_2013.pdf - Published Version Restricted to registered users only Available under License Publisher holds Copyright. Download (330kB)

The present research is based on the notion that disengagement from goals is not a discrete event but a process (Klinger, 1975). A critical phase in this process is when difficulties and setbacks in striving for a goal accumulate. This critical phase is termed here as an action crisis. Given the profound effects that people's thoughts have on their self-regulatory efficiency, it is essential to understand the cognitive correlates of an action crisis. In two experimental lab and two correlational field studies, the hypothesis that goal-related costs and benefits become cognitively highly accessible during an action crisis was tested and supported. Participants who were experiencing an action crisis in such diverse goal areas as intimate relationships, sports, and university studies, thought about goal-related costs and benefits more intensively and frequently in comparison to participants who were not in an action crisis. In an incidental learning task they recognized more of cost–benefit-items and less of implementation-items than the control group. Results are interpreted in terms of action phase specific mindsets (Gollwitzer, 1990, 2012).

Interest & Impact

Downloads

1 since deposited on 20 Feb 2014
0 in the past 12 months

Citations

5 Citations in Web of Science ®
6 Citations in Scopus

Search

in Google Scholar™

Services

Actions (login required)

Edit item

Actions (login required)

Edit item