Nonsurgical antimicrobial photodynamic therapy in moderate vs severe peri-implant defects: a clinical pilot study

Deppe, Herbert; Mücke, Thomas; Wagenpfeil, Stefan; Kesting, Marco; Sculean, Anton (2013). Nonsurgical antimicrobial photodynamic therapy in moderate vs severe peri-implant defects: a clinical pilot study. Quintessence international, 44(8), pp. 609-618. Quintessenz 10.3290/j.qi.a29505

[img] Text
quintint.pdf - Published Version
Restricted to registered users only
Available under License Publisher holds Copyright.

Download (248kB) | Request a copy

OBJECTIVE Recent review articles have shown that open debridement is more effective in the treatment of peri-implantitis than closed therapy. However, surgery may result in marginal recession and compromise esthetics. The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy of nonsurgical antimicrobial photodynamic therapy (aPDT) in moderate vs severe defects. METHOD AND MATERIALS The study encompassed 16 patients with a total of 18 ailing implants. Ten of these implants showed moderate bone loss (< 5 mm; Group 1) and eight implants severe defects (5 through 8 mm; Group 2). All implants received aPDT without surgical intervention. At baseline and 2 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months after therapy, peri-implant health was assessed including sulcus bleeding index (SBI), probing depth (PD), distance from implant shoulder to marginal mucosa (DIM), and clinical attachment level (CAL). Radiographic evaluation of distance from implant to bone (DIB) allowed comparison of peri-implant hard tissues after 6 months. RESULTS Baseline values for SBI were comparable in both groups. Three months after therapy, in both groups, SBI and CAL decreased significantly. In contrast, after 6 months, CAL and DIB increased significantly in Group 2, not in Group 1. However, DIM-values were not statistically different 6 months after therapy in both groups. CONCLUSION Within the limits of this 6-month study, nonsurgical aPDT could stop bone resorption in moderate peri-implant defects but not in severe defects. However, marginal tissue recession was not significantly different in both groups at the end of the study. Therefore, especially in esthetically important sites, surgical treatment of severe peri-implantitis defects seems to remain mandatory.

Item Type:

Journal Article (Original Article)

Division/Institute:

04 Faculty of Medicine > School of Dental Medicine > Department of Periodontology

UniBE Contributor:

Sculean, Anton

Subjects:

600 Technology > 610 Medicine & health

ISSN:

0033-6572

Publisher:

Quintessenz

Language:

English

Submitter:

Eveline Carmen Schuler

Date Deposited:

05 Mar 2014 11:38

Last Modified:

25 Jan 2017 12:15

Publisher DOI:

10.3290/j.qi.a29505

PubMed ID:

23534047

Uncontrolled Keywords:

antibacterial photodynamic therapy, laser, peri-implantitis

BORIS DOI:

10.7892/boris.40634

URI:

https://boris.unibe.ch/id/eprint/40634

Actions (login required)

Edit item Edit item
Provide Feedback