Virtual implant planning in the edentulous maxilla: criteria for decision making of prosthesis design

Avrampou, Marianna; Mericske-Stern, Regina; Blatz, Markus B.; Katsoulis, Joannis (2013). Virtual implant planning in the edentulous maxilla: criteria for decision making of prosthesis design. Clinical oral implants research, 24(Sup), pp. 152-159. Wiley-Blackwell 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02407.x

[img] Text
ClinOralImplantRes.pdf - Published Version
Restricted to registered users only
Available under License Publisher holds Copyright.

Download (567kB) | Request a copy

OBJECTIVES To evaluate prosthetic parameters in the edentulous anterior maxilla for decision making between fixed and removable implant prosthesis using virtual planning software. MATERIAL AND METHODS CT- or DVT-scans of 43 patients (mean age 62 ± 8 years) with an edentulous maxilla were analyzed with the NobelGuide software. Implants (≥3.5 mm diameter, ≥10 mm length) were virtually placed in the optimal three-dimensional prosthetic position of all maxillary front teeth. Anatomical and prosthetic landmarks, including the cervical crown point (C-Point), the acrylic flange border (F-Point), and the implant-platform buccal-end (I-Point) were defined in each middle section to determine four measuring parameters: (1) acrylic flange height (FLHeight), (2) mucosal coverage (MucCov), (3) crown-Implant distance (CID) and (4) buccal prosthesis profile (ProsthProfile). Based on these parameters, all patients were assigned to one of three classes: (A) MucCov ≤ 0 mm and ProsthProfile≥45(0) allowing for fixed prosthesis, (B) MucCov = 0-5 mm and/or ProsthProfile = 30(0) -45(0) probably allowing for fixed prosthesis, and (C) MucCov ≥ 5 mm and/or ProsthProfile ≤ 30(0) where removable prosthesis is favorable. Statistical analyses included descriptive methods and non-parametric tests. RESULTS Mean values were for FLHeight 10.0 mm, MucCov 5.6 mm, CID 7.4 mm, and ProsthProfile 39.1(0) . Seventy percent of patients fulfilled class C criteria (removable), 21% class B (probably fixed), and 2% class A (fixed), while in 7% (three patients) bone volume was insufficient for implant planning. CONCLUSIONS The proposed classification and virtual planning procedure simplify the decision-making process regarding type of prosthesis and increase predictability of esthetic treatment outcomes. It was demonstrated that in the majority of cases, the space between the prosthetic crown and implant platform had to be filled with prosthetic materials.

Item Type:

Journal Article (Original Article)

Division/Institute:

04 Faculty of Medicine > School of Dental Medicine > Department of Prosthodontics (discontinued)

UniBE Contributor:

Mericske, Regina and Katsoulis, Joannis

Subjects:

600 Technology > 610 Medicine & health

ISSN:

0905-7161

Publisher:

Wiley-Blackwell

Language:

English

Submitter:

Eveline Carmen Schuler

Date Deposited:

25 Feb 2014 09:35

Last Modified:

25 Jan 2017 12:15

Publisher DOI:

10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02407.x

PubMed ID:

22324427

Uncontrolled Keywords:

computer-assisted implantology, decision making, edentulous maxilla, three-dimensional virtual implant planning

BORIS DOI:

10.7892/boris.40797

URI:

https://boris.unibe.ch/id/eprint/40797

Actions (login required)

Edit item Edit item
Provide Feedback