Traditional and novel methods for occlusal caries detection: performance on primary teeth

Souza, J. F.; Boldieri, T.; Diniz, M. B.; Rodrigues, J. A.; Lussi, A.; Cordeiro, R. C. L. (2013). Traditional and novel methods for occlusal caries detection: performance on primary teeth. Lasers in medical science, 28(1), pp. 287-295. Springer 10.1007/s10103-012-1154-8

[img] Text
LasersMedSci.pdf - Published Version
Restricted to registered users only
Available under License Publisher holds Copyright.

Download (330kB) | Request a copy

This study aimed to assess the performance of International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS), radiographic examination, and fluorescence-based methods for detecting occlusal caries in primary teeth. One occlusal site on each of 79 primary molars was assessed twice by two examiners using ICDAS, bitewing radiography (BW), DIAGNOdent 2095 (LF), DIAGNOdent 2190 (LFpen), and VistaProof fluorescence camera (FC). The teeth were histologically prepared and assessed for caries extent. Optimal cutoff limits were calculated for LF, LFpen, and FC. At the D (1) threshold (enamel and dentin lesions), ICDAS and FC presented higher sensitivity values (0.75 and 0.73, respectively), while BW showed higher specificity (1.00). At the D (2) threshold (inner enamel and dentin lesions), ICDAS presented higher sensitivity (0.83) and statistically significantly lower specificity (0.70). At the D(3) threshold (dentin lesions), LFpen and FC showed higher sensitivity (1.00 and 0.91, respectively), while higher specificity was presented by FC (0.95), ICDAS (0.94), BW (0.94), and LF (0.92). The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (Az) varied from 0.780 (BW) to 0.941 (LF). Spearman correlation coefficients with histology were 0.72 (ICDAS), 0.64 (BW), 0.71 (LF), 0.65 (LFpen), and 0.74 (FC). Inter- and intraexaminer intraclass correlation values varied from 0.772 to 0.963 and unweighted kappa values ranged from 0.462 to 0.750. In conclusion, ICDAS and FC exhibited better accuracy in detecting enamel and dentin caries lesions, whereas ICDAS, LF, LFpen, and FC were more appropriate for detecting dentin lesions on occlusal surfaces in primary teeth, with no statistically significant difference among them. All methods presented good to excellent reproducibility.

Item Type:

Journal Article (Original Article)

Division/Institute:

04 Faculty of Medicine > School of Dental Medicine > Department of Preventive, Restorative and Pediatric Dentistry

UniBE Contributor:

De Almeida Rodrigues, Jonas and Lussi, Adrian

Subjects:

600 Technology > 610 Medicine & health

ISSN:

0268-8921

Publisher:

Springer

Language:

English

Submitter:

Eveline Carmen Schuler

Date Deposited:

03 Mar 2014 15:37

Last Modified:

25 Jan 2017 12:15

Publisher DOI:

10.1007/s10103-012-1154-8

PubMed ID:

22767324

BORIS DOI:

10.7892/boris.40803

URI:

https://boris.unibe.ch/id/eprint/40803

Actions (login required)

Edit item Edit item
Provide Feedback