Farooq, Vasim; Vranckx, Pascal; Mauri, Laura; Cutlip, Donald E; Belardi, Jorge; Silber, Sigmund; Widimsky, Petr; Leon, Martin; Windecker, Stephan; Meredith, Ian; Negoita, Manuela; van Leeuwen, Frank; Neumann, Franz-Joseph; Yeung, Alan C; Garcia-Garcia, Hector M; Serruys, Patrick W (2013). Impact of overlapping newer generation drug-eluting stents on clinical and angiographic outcomes: pooled analysis of five trials from the international Global RESOLUTE Program. Heart, 99(9), pp. 626-633. BMJ Publishing Group 10.1136/heartjnl-2012-303368
Text
626.full.pdf - Published Version Restricted to registered users only Available under License Publisher holds Copyright. Download (175kB) |
BACKGROUND
Overlapping first generation sirolimus- and paclitaxel-eluting stents are associated with persistent inflammation, fibrin deposition and delayed endothelialisation in preclinical models, and adverse angiographic and clinical outcomes--including death and myocardial infarction (MI)--in clinical studies.
OBJECTIVES
To establish as to whether there are any safety concerns with newer generation drug-eluting stents (DES).
DESIGN
Propensity score adjustment of baseline anatomical and clinical characteristics were used to compare clinical outcomes (Kaplan-Meier estimates) between patients implanted with overlapping DES (Resolute zotarolimus-eluting stent (R-ZES) or R-ZES/other DES) against no overlapping DES. Additionally, angiographic outcomes for overlapping R-ZES and everolimus-eluting stents were evaluated in the randomised RESOLUTE All-Comers Trial.
SETTING
Patient level data from five controlled studies of the RESOLUTE Global Clinical Program evaluating the R-ZES were pooled. Enrollment criteria were generally unrestrictive.
PATIENTS
5130 patients.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES
2-year clinical outcomes and 13-month angiographic outcomes.
RESULTS
644 of 5130 patients (12.6%) in the RESOLUTE Global Clinical Program underwent overlapping DES implantation. Implantation of overlapping DES was associated with an increased frequency of MI and more complex/calcified lesion types at baseline. Adjusted in-hospital, 30-day and 2-year clinical outcomes indicated comparable cardiac death (2-year overlap vs non-overlap: 3.0% vs 2.1%, p=0.36), major adverse cardiac events (13.3% vs 10.7%, p=0.19), target-vessel MI (3.9% vs 3.4%, p=0.40), clinically driven target vessel revascularisation (7.7% vs 6.5%, p=0.32), and definite/probable stent thrombosis (1.4% vs 0.9%, p=0.28). 13-month adjusted angiographic outcomes were comparable between overlapping and non-overlapping DES.
CONCLUSIONS
Overlapping newer generation DES are safe and effective, with comparable angiographic and clinical outcomes--including repeat revascularisation--to non-overlapping DES.
Item Type: |
Journal Article (Original Article) |
---|---|
Division/Institute: |
04 Faculty of Medicine > Department of Cardiovascular Disorders (DHGE) > Clinic of Cardiology |
UniBE Contributor: |
Windecker, Stephan |
Subjects: |
600 Technology > 610 Medicine & health |
ISSN: |
1355-6037 |
Publisher: |
BMJ Publishing Group |
Language: |
English |
Submitter: |
Judith Liniger |
Date Deposited: |
19 Mar 2014 15:59 |
Last Modified: |
05 Dec 2022 14:28 |
Publisher DOI: |
10.1136/heartjnl-2012-303368 |
PubMed ID: |
23468513 |
BORIS DOI: |
10.7892/boris.41681 |
URI: |
https://boris.unibe.ch/id/eprint/41681 |