Rechtsmittel gegen Entscheide des juge d'appui bei der internationalen Schiedsgerichtsbarkeit der Schweiz

Markus, Alexander R. (2013). Rechtsmittel gegen Entscheide des juge d'appui bei der internationalen Schiedsgerichtsbarkeit der Schweiz. ASA Bulletin, 31(3), pp. 504-520. Kluwer Law International

[img] Text
ASAB 31-3_Alexander R. Markus_Offprint.pdf - Published Version
Restricted to registered users only
Available under License Publisher holds Copyright.

Download (2MB) | Request a copy

The author examines whether and by which means the decisions handed down by the State judge giving his support to the arbitral proceeding (juge d'appui) may be appealed. Every relevant Article in the PILA (Private International Law Act) is addressed and analyzed in this regard (Art. 179(2) and (3), Art. 180(3), Art. 183(2), Art. 184(3) and Art. 185) by reference to the present legal doctrine and case law. Concerning the stages of appeal, the view is held that by direct or analogous application of Art. 356(2) CPC (Civil Procedure Code) the juge d'appui has jurisdiction as the sole instance of the Canton to render decisions in support of the arbitral tribunal. On the federal level however, the parties shall have the right to appeal against these decisions by filing a civil law appeal before the Swiss Federal Supreme Court, with the exception of most decisions given by juge d'appui within the meaning of Art. 180(3) PILA. As to this federal appeal, it is established that the case law of the Swiss Federal Supreme Court under the FTA (Act on the Federal Tribunal) indicates the Court's inclination to qualify both negative and positive decisions issued by the juge d'appui as final decisions in terms of Art. 90 FTA. In reference to the upcoming revision of the PILA's 12th Chapter the author concludes that the legislator might implement some clarifications in the current legal framework. It seems particularly advisable to ensure that all relevant Articles in the PILA regarding decisions of the juge d'appui explicitly reference to Art. 356(2) CPC. Moreover, the author is of the opinion that it would also be expedient to specify the

Item Type:

Journal Article (Original Article)

Division/Institute:

02 Faculty of Law > Department of Private Law > Institute for Swiss and International Civil Procedure and Private International Law

UniBE Contributor:

Markus, Alexander

Subjects:

300 Social sciences, sociology & anthropology > 340 Law

ISSN:

1567-2557

Publisher:

Kluwer Law International

Language:

German

Submitter:

Delphine Blanc

Date Deposited:

10 Jul 2014 16:41

Last Modified:

13 Aug 2019 12:07

BORIS DOI:

10.7892/boris.43454

URI:

https://boris.unibe.ch/id/eprint/43454

Actions (login required)

Edit item Edit item
Provide Feedback