Theories of Militancy in Practice: Explanations of Muslim Terrorism in India

Eckert, Julia (2012). Theories of Militancy in Practice: Explanations of Muslim Terrorism in India. Social Science History, 36(3), pp. 47-72. Duke University Press 10.1215/01455532-1595381

[img] Text
Theories_of_Militancy_in_Practice_Explan.pdf - Published Version
Restricted to registered users only
Available under License Publisher holds Copyright.

Download (829kB)

This article analyzes the interaction between theories of radicalization and state responses to militancy in India. Focusing on the interpretation of the increased frequency of terrorist attacks in Indian metropolises in the last decade, the article examines the narratives surrounding those classified as terrorists in the context of rising Muslim militancy in the country. Different state agencies operate with different theories about the links between processes of radicalization and terrorist violence. The scenarios of radicalization underlying legislative efforts to prevent terrorism, the construction of motives by the police, and the interpretation of violence by the judiciary all rely on assumptions about radicalization and violence. Such narratives are used to explain terrorism both to security agencies and to the public; they inform the categories and scenarios of prevention. Prevention relies on detection of future deeds, planning, intentions, and even potential intentions. "Detection" of potential intentions relies on assumptions about specific dispositions. Identification of such dispositions in turn relies on the context-specific theories of the causes of militancy. These determine what "characteristics" of individuals or groups indicate potential threats and form the basis for their categorization as "potentially dangerous." The article explores the cultural contexts of theories of radicalization, focusing on how they are framed by societal understandings of the causes of deviance and the relation between the individual and society emerging in contemporary India. It examines the shift in the perception of threat and the categories of "dangerous others" from a focus on role to a focus on ascriptive identity.

Item Type:

Journal Article (Original Article)

Division/Institute:

06 Faculty of Humanities > Department of Art and Cultural Studies > Institute of Social Anthropology

UniBE Contributor:

Eckert, Julia

Subjects:

300 Social sciences, sociology & anthropology

ISSN:

0145-5532

Series:

Social Science History Journal

Publisher:

Duke University Press

Language:

English

Submitter:

Johanna Weidtmann

Date Deposited:

09 Apr 2014 09:15

Last Modified:

05 Dec 2022 14:31

Publisher DOI:

10.1215/01455532-1595381

BORIS DOI:

10.7892/boris.45970

URI:

https://boris.unibe.ch/id/eprint/45970

Actions (login required)

Edit item Edit item
Provide Feedback