Basso, Alessandra; Coslovsky, Michael; Richner, Heinz (2014). Parasite- and predator-induced maternal effects in the great tit (Parus major). Behavioral Ecology, 25(5), pp. 1105-1114. Oxford University Press 10.1093/beheco/aru088
![[img]](https://boris.unibe.ch/style/images/fileicons/text.png) |
Text
Basso BehavEcol 2014.pdf - Published Version Restricted to registered users only Available under License Publisher holds Copyright. Download (635kB) |
|
|
Text
aru088.pdf - Other Available under License Publisher holds Copyright. Download (1MB) | Preview |
Both predators and parasites can elicit behavioral and physiological responses in prey and hosts, respectively. These responses may involve the reallocation of resources and may thus limit each other. We investigated the effects of concurrent pre-laying exposure of great tit females (Parus major) to both a simulated predation risk and a nest-based ectoparasite, the hen flea (Ceratophyllus gallinae), on nestling growth and development. We manipulated perceived predation risk using models and vocalizations of sparrowhawks (Accipiter nisus). At the start of incubation, we swapped whole clutches between treated and untreated nests to separate pre-laying maternal effects from posthatching effects. Since costs and benefits of maternal responses to parasites need to be assessed under parasite pressure, we infested half of the rearing nests with hen fleas. Parasites had negative effects on mass gain and wing growth, both via maternal effects and via direct exposure of nestlings, whereas maternal predation risk had no significant effect. The interaction between predator and parasite treatments was not significant and, thus, suggests the absence of a trade-off between the 2 stressors operating at the level of maternal effects. Alternatively, the complexity of the design, despite a relatively large sample size, may have limited the power for detection of this expected trade-off.
Actions (login required)
 |
Edit item |