Integrated care programmes for adults with chronic conditions: a meta-review.

Martinez-Gonzalez, Nahara Anani; Berchtold, Peter; Ullman, Klara; Busato, André; Egger, Matthias (2014). Integrated care programmes for adults with chronic conditions: a meta-review. International journal for quality in health care, 26(5), pp. 561-570. Oxford University Press 10.1093/intqhc/mzu071

[img]
Preview
Text
Martinez-Gonzalez IntJQualHealthCare 2014.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons: Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works (CC-BY-NC-ND).

Download (369kB) | Preview
[img]
Preview
Text
mzu071.pdf - Other
Available under License ["licenses_description_cc-by-nc-nd" not defined].

Download (390kB) | Preview

OBJECTIVE To review systematic reviews and meta-analyses of integrated care programmes in chronically ill patients, with a focus on methodological quality, elements of integration assessed and effects reported. DESIGN Meta-review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses identified in Medline (1946-March 2012), Embase (1980-March 2012), CINHAL (1981-March 2012) and the Cochrane Library of Systematic Reviews (issue 1, 2012). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Methodological quality assessed by the 11-item Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) checklist; elements of integration assessed using a published list of 10 key principles of integration; effects on patient-centred outcomes, process quality, use of healthcare and costs. RESULTS Twenty-seven systematic reviews were identified; conditions included chronic heart failure (CHF; 12 reviews), diabetes mellitus (DM; seven reviews), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD; seven reviews) and asthma (five reviews). The median number of AMSTAR checklist items met was five: few reviewers searched for unpublished literature or described the primary studies and interventions in detail. Most reviews covered comprehensive services across the care continuum or standardization of care through inter-professional teams, but organizational culture, governance structure or financial management were rarely assessed. A majority of reviews found beneficial effects of integration, including reduced hospital admissions and re-admissions (in CHF and DM), improved adherence to treatment guidelines (DM, COPD and asthma) or quality of life (DM). Few reviews showed reductions in costs. CONCLUSIONS Systematic reviews of integrated care programmes were of mixed quality, assessed only some components of integration of care, and showed consistent benefits for some outcomes but not others.

Item Type:

Journal Article (Original Article)

Division/Institute:

04 Faculty of Medicine > Pre-clinic Human Medicine > Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine
?? DCD5A442BD57E17DE0405C82790C4DE2 ??

UniBE Contributor:

Berchtold, Peter E.; Ullmann, Klara; Busato, André and Egger, Matthias

Subjects:

600 Technology > 610 Medicine & health
300 Social sciences, sociology & anthropology > 360 Social problems & social services

ISSN:

1353-4505

Publisher:

Oxford University Press

Language:

English

Submitter:

Doris Kopp Heim

Date Deposited:

14 Oct 2014 08:59

Last Modified:

29 Oct 2019 11:36

Publisher DOI:

10.1093/intqhc/mzu071

PubMed ID:

25108537

Uncontrolled Keywords:

chronic conditions health services research integrated healthcare quality improvement systematic review

BORIS DOI:

10.7892/boris.58257

URI:

https://boris.unibe.ch/id/eprint/58257

Actions (login required)

Edit item Edit item
Provide Feedback