Pilgrim, Thomas; Englberger, Lars; Rothenbühler, Martina; Stortecky, Stefan; Ceylan, Osman; O'Sullivan, Crochan John; Huber, Christoph; Praz, Fabien; Büllesfeld, Lutz; Langhammer, Bettina; Meier, Bernhard; Jüni, Peter; Carrel, Thierry; Windecker, Stephan; Wenaweser, Peter Martin (2015). Long-term outcome of elderly patients with severe aortic stenosis as a function of treatment modality. Heart (British Cardiac Society), 101(1), pp. 30-36. BMJ Publishing Group 10.1136/heartjnl-2014-306106
Text
Pilgrim Heart 2015.pdf - Published Version Restricted to registered users only Available under License Publisher holds Copyright. Download (917kB) |
OBJECTIVE
To assess long-term clinical outcomes of consecutive high-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis according to treatment allocation to transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) or medical treatment (MT).
METHODS
Patients with severe aortic stenosis were consecutively enrolled into a prospective single centre registry.
RESULTS
Among 442 patients (median age 83 years, median STS-score 4.7) allocated to MT (n=78), SAVR (n=107), or TAVI (n=257) all-cause mortality amounted to 81%, 37% and 43% after a median duration of follow-up of 3.9 years (p<0.001). Rates of major adverse cerebro-cardiovascular events were lower in patients undergoing SAVR or TAVI as compared with MT (SAVR vs MT: HR 0.31, 95% CI 0.21 to 0.46) (TAVI vs MT: HR 0.34, 95% CI 0.25 to 0.46), with no significant difference between SAVR and TAVI (HR 0.88, 95% CI 0.62 to 1.25). Whereas SAVR (HR 0.39, 95% CI 0.24 to 0.61), TAVI (HR 0.37, 95% CI 0.26 to 0.52), and female gender (HR 0.72, 95% CI 0.53 to 0.99) were associated with improved survival, body mass index ≤20 kg/m(2) (HR 1.60, 95% CI 1.04 to 2.47), diabetes (HR 1.48, 95% CI 1.03 to 2.12), peripheral vascular disease (HR 2.01, 95% CI 1.44 to 2.81), atrial fibrillation (HR 1.74, 95% CI 1.28 to 2.37) and pulmonary hypertension (HR 1.43, 95% CI 1.03 to 2.00) were identified as independent predictors of mortality.
CONCLUSIONS
Among high-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis, long-term clinical outcome through 5 years was comparable between patients allocated to SAVR or TAVI. In contrast, patients with MT had a dismal prognosis.