The reporting quality of randomized controlled trials in orthodontics.

Lempesi, Evangelia; Koletsi, Despina; Fleming, Padhraig S; Pandis, Nikolaos (2014). The reporting quality of randomized controlled trials in orthodontics. Journal of evidence-based dental practice, 14(2), pp. 46-52. Mosby 10.1016/j.jebdp.2013.12.001

[img] Text
The Reporting Quality.pdf - Published Version
Restricted to registered users only
Available under License Publisher holds Copyright.

Download (268kB) | Request a copy

OBJECTIVES Accurate trial reporting facilitates evaluation and better use of study results. The objective of this article is to investigate the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in leading orthodontic journals, and to explore potential predictors of improved reporting. METHODS The 50 most recent issues of 4 leading orthodontic journals until November 2013 were electronically searched. Reporting quality assessment was conducted using the modified CONSORT statement checklist. The relationship between potential predictors and the modified CONSORT score was assessed using linear regression modeling. RESULTS 128 RCTs were identified with a mean modified CONSORT score of 68.97% (SD = 11.09). The Journal of Orthodontics (JO) ranked first in terms of completeness of reporting (modified CONSORT score 76.21%, SD = 10.1), followed by American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics (AJODO) (73.05%, SD = 10.1). Journal of publication (AJODO: β = 10.08, 95% CI: 5.78, 14.38; JO: β = 16.82, 95% CI: 11.70, 21.94; EJO: β = 7.21, 95% CI: 2.69, 11.72 compared to Angle), year of publication (β = 0.98, 95% CI: 0.28, 1.67 for each additional year), region of authorship (Europe: β = 5.19, 95% CI: 1.30, 9.09 compared to Asia/other), statistical significance (significant: β = 3.10, 95% CI: 0.11, 6.10 compared to non-significant) and methodologist involvement (involvement: β = 5.60, 95% CI: 1.66, 9.54 compared to non-involvement) were all significant predictors of improved modified CONSORT scores in the multivariable model. Additionally, median overall Jadad score was 2 (IQR = 2) across journals, with JO (median = 3, IQR = 1) and AJODO (median = 3, IQR = 2) presenting the highest score values. CONCLUSION The reporting quality of RCTs published in leading orthodontic journals is considered suboptimal in various CONSORT areas. This may have a bearing in trial result interpretation and use in clinical decision making and evidence- based orthodontic treatment interventions.

Item Type:

Journal Article (Original Article)

Division/Institute:

04 Faculty of Medicine > School of Dental Medicine > Department of Orthodontics

UniBE Contributor:

Pandis, Nikolaos

Subjects:

600 Technology > 610 Medicine & health

ISSN:

1532-3382

Publisher:

Mosby

Language:

English

Submitter:

Eveline Carmen Schuler

Date Deposited:

26 Nov 2014 16:38

Last Modified:

25 Jan 2017 12:15

Publisher DOI:

10.1016/j.jebdp.2013.12.001

PubMed ID:

24913524

Uncontrolled Keywords:

RCTs, Orthodontic journals, CONSORT, Jadad scale, Reporting quality

BORIS DOI:

10.7892/boris.60613

URI:

https://boris.unibe.ch/id/eprint/60613

Actions (login required)

Edit item Edit item
Provide Feedback