Distal interlocking screw placement in the femur: free-hand versus electromagnetic assisted technique (sureshot).

Maqungo, Sithombo; Horn, Anria; Bernstein, Brian; Keel, Marius; Roche, Stephen (2014). Distal interlocking screw placement in the femur: free-hand versus electromagnetic assisted technique (sureshot). Journal of orthopaedic trauma, 28(12), e281-e283. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000125

[img]
Preview
Text
00005131-201412000-00013.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Publisher holds Copyright.

Download (92kB) | Preview

OBJECTIVES

To compare the free-hand (FH) technique of placing interlocking screws to a commercially available electromagnetic (EM) targeting system in terms of operating time, radiation dose, and accuracy of screw placement.

METHODS

Between September 2011 and July 2012, we prospectively randomized 100 consecutive femur shaft fractures in 99 patients requiring intramedullary nails to either FH using fluoroscopy (n = 43) or EM targeting (n = 38; Sureshot).

SETTING

Single Level 1 University Hospital Trauma Center.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

The 2 groups were assessed for distal locking with respect to time, radiation, and accuracy.

RESULTS

Eight-one fractures had data accurately recorded (38 EM/43 FH). The average total operative time was 50 minutes (range, 25-88 minutes; SD, 13.9 minutes) for the FH group and 57 minutes (range, 40-103 minutes; SD, 16.12 minutes) for the EM group. The average time for distal locking was 10 minutes (range, 4-16 minutes; SD, 3.56 minutes) with FH and 11 minutes (range, 6-28 minutes; SD, 10.24 minutes) with EM. Average radiation dose for distal locking was significantly less (P < 0.0001) for EM at 230.54 μGy (range, 51-660 μGy; SD, 0.17 μGy) compared with 690.27 μGy (range, 200-2310 μGy; SD, 0.52 μGy) for FH. There were 2 misplaced drill bits in FH and 3 in EM. This was not statistically significant (P = 0.888).

CONCLUSIONS

The electromagnetic targeting device (Sureshot) significantly reduced radiation exposure during placement of distal interlocking screws, without sacrificing operative time, and was equivalent in accuracy when compared with the FH technique.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic level II.

Item Type:

Journal Article (Original Article)

Division/Institute:

04 Faculty of Medicine > Department of Orthopaedic, Plastic and Hand Surgery (DOPH) > Clinic of Orthopaedic Surgery

UniBE Contributor:

Keel, Marius

Subjects:

600 Technology > 610 Medicine & health

ISSN:

0890-5339

Publisher:

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Language:

English

Submitter:

Stefanie Zurbuchen

Date Deposited:

10 Feb 2015 16:36

Last Modified:

05 Dec 2022 14:40

Publisher DOI:

10.1097/BOT.0000000000000125

PubMed ID:

24714403

BORIS DOI:

10.7892/boris.62963

URI:

https://boris.unibe.ch/id/eprint/62963

Actions (login required)

Edit item Edit item
Provide Feedback