Decision-making in aortic root surgery in Marfan syndrome: bleeding, thromboembolism and risk of reintervention after valve-sparing or mechanical aortic root replacement

Schönhoff, Florian; Langhammer, Bettina; Wustmann, Kerstin Brigitte; Reineke, David Christian; Kadner, Alexander; Carrel, Thierry (2015). Decision-making in aortic root surgery in Marfan syndrome: bleeding, thromboembolism and risk of reintervention after valve-sparing or mechanical aortic root replacement. European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery, 48(6), pp. 931-936. Oxford University Press 10.1093/ejcts/ezu553

[img] Text
ejcts.ezu553.pdf - Published Version
Restricted to registered users only
Available under License Publisher holds Copyright.

Download (373kB) | Request a copy
[img]
Preview
Text
ezu553.pdf - Other
Available under License Publisher holds Copyright.

Download (216kB) | Preview

OBJECTIVES Valve-sparing root replacement (VSRR) is thought to reduce the rate of thromboembolic and bleeding events compared with aortic root replacement using a mechanical aortic root replacement (MRR) with a composite graft by avoiding oral anticoagulation. But as VSRR carries a certain risk for subsequent reinterventions, decision-making in the individual patient can be challenging. METHODS Of 100 Marfan syndrome (MFS) patients who underwent 169 aortic surgeries and were followed at our institution since 1995, 59 consecutive patients without a history of dissection or prior aortic surgery underwent elective VSRR or MRR and were retrospectively analysed. RESULTS VSRR was performed in 29 (David n = 24, Yacoub n = 5) and MRR in 30 patients. The mean age was 33 ± 15 years. The mean follow-up after VSRR was 6.5 ± 4 years (180 patient-years) compared with 8.8 ± 9 years (274 patient-years) after MRR. Reoperation rates after root remodelling (Yacoub) were significantly higher than after the reimplantation (David) procedure (60 vs 4.2%, P = 0.01). The need for reinterventions after the reimplantation procedure (0.8% per patient-year) was not significantly higher than after MRR (P = 0.44) but follow-up after VSRR was significantly shorter (P = 0.03). There was neither significant morbidity nor mortality associated with root reoperations. There were no neurological events after VSRR compared with four stroke/intracranial bleeding events in the MRR group (log-rank, P = 0.11), translating into an event rate of 1.46% per patient-year following MRR. CONCLUSION The calculated annual failure rate after VSRR using the reimplantation technique was lower than the annual risk for thromboembolic or bleeding events. Since the perioperative risk of reinterventions following VSRR is low, patients might benefit from VSRR even if redo surgery may become necessary during follow-up.

Item Type:

Journal Article (Original Article)

Division/Institute:

04 Faculty of Medicine > Department of Cardiovascular Disorders (DHGE) > Clinic of Cardiovascular Surgery
04 Faculty of Medicine > Department of Cardiovascular Disorders (DHGE) > Clinic of Cardiology

UniBE Contributor:

Schönhoff, Florian; Langhammer, Bettina; Wustmann, Kerstin Brigitte; Reineke, David Christian; Kadner, Alexander and Carrel, Thierry

Subjects:

600 Technology > 610 Medicine & health

ISSN:

1010-7940

Publisher:

Oxford University Press

Language:

English

Submitter:

Sara Baumberger

Date Deposited:

20 Feb 2015 10:47

Last Modified:

01 Dec 2018 02:31

Publisher DOI:

10.1093/ejcts/ezu553

PubMed ID:

25666470

Uncontrolled Keywords:

Aortic root surgery, Aortic surgery, Connective tissue disease, Marfan syndrome, Valve-sparing surgery

BORIS DOI:

10.7892/boris.63389

URI:

https://boris.unibe.ch/id/eprint/63389

Actions (login required)

Edit item Edit item
Provide Feedback