Exceptional or just well connected? Political entrepreneurs and brokers in policy making

Christopoulos, Dimitris; Ingold, Karin (2015). Exceptional or just well connected? Political entrepreneurs and brokers in policy making. European political science review, 7(3), pp. 475-498. Cambridge University Press 10.1017/S1755773914000277

[img] Text
S1755773914000277a.pdf - Published Version
Restricted to registered users only
Available under License Publisher holds Copyright.

Download (604kB) | Request a copy
[img] Text
S1755773914000277.pdf - Other
Restricted to registered users only until 1 August 2020.
Available under License Publisher holds Copyright.

Download (518kB) | Request a copy

Policy brokers and policy entrepreneurs are assumed to have a decisive impact on policy outcomes. Their access to social and political resources is contingent on their influence on other agents. In social network analysis (SNA), entrepreneurs are often closely associated with brokers, because both are agents presumed to benefit from bridging structural holes; for example, gaining advantage through occupying a strategic position in relational space. Our aim here is twofold. First, to conceptually and operationally differentiate policy brokers from policy entrepreneurs premised on assumptions in the policy-process literature; and second, via SNA, to use the output of core algorithms in a cross-sectional analysis of political brokerage and political entrepreneurship. We attempt to simplify the use of graph algebra in answering questions relevant to policy analysis by placing each algorithm within its theoretical context. In the methodology employed, we first identify actors and graph their relations of influence within a specific policy event; then we select the most central actors; and compare their rank in a series of statistics that capture different aspects of their network advantage. We examine betweenness centrality, positive and negative Bonacich power, Burt’s effective size and constraint and honest brokerage as paradigmatic. We employ two case studies to demonstrate the advantages and limitations of each algorithm for differentiating between brokers and entrepreneurs: one on Swiss climate policy and one on EU competition and transport policy.

Item Type:

Journal Article (Original Article)

Division/Institute:

03 Faculty of Business, Economics and Social Sciences > Social Sciences > Institute of Political Science
10 Strategic Research Centers > Oeschger Centre for Climate Change Research (OCCR)

UniBE Contributor:

Ingold, Karin Mirjam

Subjects:

300 Social sciences, sociology & anthropology > 320 Political science

ISSN:

1755-7739

Publisher:

Cambridge University Press

Language:

English

Submitter:

Karin Mirjam Ingold Michel

Date Deposited:

26 Mar 2015 11:56

Last Modified:

27 Oct 2019 22:49

Publisher DOI:

10.1017/S1755773914000277

Uncontrolled Keywords:

policy entrepreneurs, policy brokers, social network analysis

BORIS DOI:

10.7892/boris.65340

URI:

https://boris.unibe.ch/id/eprint/65340

Actions (login required)

Edit item Edit item
Provide Feedback