Outcome study of real-time MR-guided cervical periradicular injection therapy in an open 1.0 Tesla MRI system

Maurer, Martin; Disch, Alexander C; Hartwig, Tony; Renz, Diane M; Schreiter, Nils; Hamm, B; Streitparth, Florian (2014). Outcome study of real-time MR-guided cervical periradicular injection therapy in an open 1.0 Tesla MRI system. Cardiovascular and interventional radiology, 37(3), pp. 756-762. Springer 10.1007/s00270-013-0738-4

[img] Text
art%3A10.1007%2Fs00270-013-0738-4.pdf - Published Version
Restricted to registered users only
Available under License Publisher holds Copyright.

Download (455kB) | Request a copy

PURPOSE To evaluate the accuracy, safety, and efficacy of cervical nerve root injection therapy using magnetic resonance guidance in an open 1.0 T MRI system. METHODS Between September 2009 and April 2012, a total of 21 patients (9 men, 12 women; mean age 47.1 ± 11.1 years) underwent MR-guided cervical periradicular injection for cervical radicular pain in an open 1.0 T system. An interactive proton density-weighted turbo spin echo (PDw TSE) sequence was used for real-time guidance of the MR-compatible 20-gauge injection needle. Clinical outcome was evaluated on a verbal numeric rating scale (VNRS) before injection therapy (baseline) and at 1 week and 1, 3, and 6 months during follow-up. RESULTS All procedures were technically successful and there were no major complications. The mean preinterventional VNRS score was 7.42 and exhibited a statistically significant decrease (P < 0.001) at all follow-up time points: 3.86 ± 1.53 at 1 week, 3.21 ± 2.19 at 1 month, 2.58 ± 2.54 at 3 months, and 2.76 ± 2.63 at 6 months. At 6 months, 14.3 % of the patients reported complete resolution of radicular pain and 38.1 % each had either significant (4-8 VNRS score points) or mild (1-3 VNRS score points) relief of pain; 9.5 % experienced no pain relief. CONCLUSION Magnetic resonance fluoroscopy-guided periradicular cervical spine injection is an accurate, safe, and efficacious treatment option for patients with cervical radicular pain. The technique may be a promising alternative to fluoroscopy- or CT-guided injections of the cervical spine, especially in young patients and in patients requiring repeat injections.

Item Type:

Journal Article (Original Article)

Division/Institute:

04 Faculty of Medicine > Department of Radiology, Neuroradiology and Nuclear Medicine (DRNN) > Institute of Diagnostic, Interventional and Paediatric Radiology

UniBE Contributor:

Maurer, Martin

Subjects:

600 Technology > 610 Medicine & health

ISSN:

0174-1551

Publisher:

Springer

Language:

English

Submitter:

Aisha Stefania Mzinga

Date Deposited:

07 Apr 2015 10:12

Last Modified:

05 Nov 2015 11:19

Publisher DOI:

10.1007/s00270-013-0738-4

PubMed ID:

24045999

BORIS DOI:

10.7892/boris.66105

URI:

https://boris.unibe.ch/id/eprint/66105

Actions (login required)

Edit item Edit item
Provide Feedback