Metamizole-associated adverse events: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Kötter, Thomas; Da Costa, Bruno R; Fässler, Margrit; Blozik, Eva; Linde, Klaus; Jüni, Peter; Reichenbach, Stephan; Scherer, Martin (2015). Metamizole-associated adverse events: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE, 10(4), e0122918. Public Library of Science 10.1371/journal.pone.0122918

[img]
Preview
Text
Kötter PLoSOne 2015.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons: Attribution (CC-BY).

Download (658kB) | Preview

BACKGROUND

Metamizole is used to treat pain in many parts of the world. Information on the safety profile of metamizole is scarce; no conclusive summary of the literature exists.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether metamizole is clinically safe compared to placebo and other analgesics.

METHODS

We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and several clinical trial registries. We screened the reference lists of included trials and previous systematic reviews. We included randomized controlled trials that compared the effects of metamizole, administered to adults in any form and for any indication, to other analgesics or to placebo. Two authors extracted data regarding trial design and size, indications for pain medication, patient characteristics, treatment regimens, and methodological characteristics. Adverse events (AEs), serious adverse events (SAEs), and dropouts were assessed. We conducted separate meta-analyses for each metamizole comparator, using standard inverse-variance random effects meta-analysis to pool the estimates across trials, reported as risk ratios (RRs). We calculated the DerSimonian and Laird variance estimate T2 to measure heterogeneity between trials. The pre-specified primary end point was any AE during the trial period.

RESULTS

Of the 696 potentially eligible trials, 79 trials including almost 4000 patients with short-term metamizole use of less than two weeks met our inclusion criteria. Fewer AEs were reported for metamizole compared to opioids, RR = 0.79 (confidence interval 0.79 to 0.96). We found no differences between metamizole and placebo, paracetamol and NSAIDs. Only a few SAEs were reported, with no difference between metamizole and other analgesics. No agranulocytosis or deaths were reported. Our results were limited by the mediocre overall quality of the reports.

CONCLUSION

For short-term use in the hospital setting, metamizole seems to be a safe choice when compared to other widely used analgesics. High-quality, adequately sized trials assessing the intermediate- and long-term safety of metamizole are needed.

Item Type:

Journal Article (Original Article)

Division/Institute:

04 Faculty of Medicine > Pre-clinic Human Medicine > Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine (ISPM)
04 Faculty of Medicine > Medical Education > Institute of General Practice and Primary Care (BIHAM)

UniBE Contributor:

Da Costa, Bruno and Reichenbach, Stephan

Subjects:

600 Technology > 610 Medicine & health
300 Social sciences, sociology & anthropology > 360 Social problems & social services

ISSN:

1932-6203

Publisher:

Public Library of Science

Language:

English

Submitter:

Doris Kopp Heim

Date Deposited:

27 May 2015 09:24

Last Modified:

20 Sep 2020 03:55

Publisher DOI:

10.1371/journal.pone.0122918

PubMed ID:

25875821

Additional Information:

Kötter and da Costa contributed equally to this work.

BORIS DOI:

10.7892/boris.68976

URI:

https://boris.unibe.ch/id/eprint/68976

Actions (login required)

Edit item Edit item
Provide Feedback