The impact of common versus separate estimation of orbit parameters on GRACE gravity field solutions

Meyer, Ulrich; Jäggi, Adrian; Beutler, Gerhard; Bock, Heike (2015). The impact of common versus separate estimation of orbit parameters on GRACE gravity field solutions. Journal of geodesy, 89(7), pp. 685-696. Springer 10.1007/s00190-015-0807-3

Preview	Text um_2014_rev3.pdf - Accepted Version Available under License Publisher holds Copyright. Download (1MB) | Preview
Preview	Text art%3A10.1007%2Fs00190-015-0807-3.pdf - Published Version Available under License Publisher holds Copyright. Download (2MB) | Preview

Gravity field parameters are usually determined from observations of the GRACE satellite mission together with arc-specific parameters in a generalized orbit determination process. When separating the estimation of gravity field parameters from the determination of the satellites’ orbits, correlations between orbit parameters and gravity field coefficients are ignored and the latter parameters are biased towards the a priori force model. We are thus confronted with a kind of hidden regularization. To decipher the underlying mechanisms, the Celestial Mechanics Approach is complemented by tools to modify the impact of the pseudo-stochastic arc-specific parameters on the normal equations level and to efficiently generate ensembles of solutions. By introducing a time variable a priori model and solving for hourly pseudo-stochastic accelerations, a significant reduction of noisy striping in the monthly solutions can be achieved. Setting up more frequent pseudo-stochastic parameters results in a further reduction of the noise, but also in a notable damping of the observed geophysical signals. To quantify the effect of the a priori model on the monthly solutions, the process of fixing the orbit parameters is replaced by an equivalent introduction of special pseudo-observations, i.e., by explicit regularization. The contribution of the thereby introduced a priori information is determined by a contribution analysis. The presented mechanism is valid universally. It may be used to separate any subset of parameters by pseudo-observations of a special design and to quantify the damage imposed on the solution.

Interest & Impact

Downloads

375 since deposited on 22 Jun 2015
32 in the past 12 months

Citations

5 Citations in Web of Science ®
6 Citations in Scopus

Search

in Google Scholar™

Services

Actions (login required)

Edit item

Actions (login required)

Edit item