Bond Strength of Resin Composite to Dentin with Different Adhesive Systems: Influence of Relative Humidity and Application Time.

Amsler, Fabienne; Peutzfeldt, Anne; Lussi, Adrian; Flury, Simon (2015). Bond Strength of Resin Composite to Dentin with Different Adhesive Systems: Influence of Relative Humidity and Application Time. Journal of adhesive dentistry, 17(3), pp. 249-256. Quintessence Publ. 10.3290/j.jad.a34400

[img] Text
Amsler_et_al._2015pdf.pdf - Published Version
Restricted to registered users only
Available under License Publisher holds Copyright.

Download (1MB) | Request a copy

PURPOSE To investigate the influence of relative humidity and application time on bond strength to dentin of different classes of adhesive systems. MATERIALS AND METHODS A total of 360 extracted human molars were ground to mid-coronal dentin. The dentin specimens were treated with one of six adhesive systems (Syntac Classic, OptiBond FL, Clearfil SE Bond, AdheSE, Xeno Select, or Scotchbond Universal), and resin composite (Filtek Z250) was applied to the treated dentin surface under four experimental conditions (45% relative humidity/application time according to manufacturers' instructions; 45% relative humidity/reduced application time; 85% relative humidity/application time according to manufacturers' instructions; 85% relative humidity/reduced application time). After storage (37°C, 100% humidity, 24 h), shear bond strength (SBS) was measured and data analyzed with nonparametric ANOVA followed by Kruskal-Wallis tests and Mann-Whitney U-tests with Bonferroni-Holm correction for multiple testing (level of significance: α = 0.05). RESULTS Increased relative humidity and reduced application time had no effect on SBS for Clearfil SE Bond and Scotchbond Universal (p = 1.00). For Syntac Classic, OptiBond FL, AdheSE, and Xeno Select there was no effect on SBS of reduced application time of the adhesive system (p ≥ 0.403). However, increased relative humidity significantly reduced SBS for Syntac Classic, OptiBond FL, and Xeno Select irrespective of application time (p ≤ 0.003), whereas for AdheSE, increased relative humidity significantly reduced SBS at recommended application time only (p = 0.002). CONCLUSION Generally, increased relative humidity had a detrimental effect on SBS to dentin, but reduced application time had no effect.

Item Type:

Journal Article (Original Article)

Division/Institute:

04 Faculty of Medicine > School of Dental Medicine > Department of Preventive, Restorative and Pediatric Dentistry

UniBE Contributor:

Amsler, Fabienne; Peutzfeldt, Anne; Lussi, Adrian and Flury, Simon

Subjects:

600 Technology > 610 Medicine & health

ISSN:

1461-5185

Publisher:

Quintessence Publ.

Funders:

[UNSPECIFIED] SSO-Forschungsfonds

Language:

English

Submitter:

Simon Flury

Date Deposited:

29 Jun 2015 17:37

Last Modified:

09 Oct 2015 10:10

Publisher DOI:

10.3290/j.jad.a34400

PubMed ID:

26114164

Uncontrolled Keywords:

adhesion, adhesive treatment, dentin bonding, working time, moisture

BORIS DOI:

10.7892/boris.69856

URI:

https://boris.unibe.ch/id/eprint/69856

Actions (login required)

Edit item Edit item
Provide Feedback