Validation of the Asthma Predictive Index and comparison with simpler clinical prediction rules

Leonardi, Nora A; Spycher, Ben D; Strippoli, Marie-Pierre F; Frey, Urs; Silverman, Michael; Kuehni, Claudia E (2011). Validation of the Asthma Predictive Index and comparison with simpler clinical prediction rules. Journal of allergy and clinical immunology, 127(6), 1466-72.e6. St. Louis, Mo.: Mosby 10.1016/j.jaci.2011.03.001

[img] Text
Leonardi JAllergyClinImmunol 2011.pdf - Published Version
Restricted to registered users only
Available under License Publisher holds Copyright.

Download (248kB) | Request a copy

Background The loose and stringent Asthma Predictive Indices (API), developed in Tucson, are popular rules to predict asthma in preschool children. To be clinically useful, they require validation in different settings. Objective To assess the predictive performance of the API in an independent population and compare it with simpler rules based only on preschool wheeze. Methods We studied 1954 children of the population-based Leicester Respiratory Cohort, followed up from age 1 to 10 years. The API and frequency of wheeze were assessed at age 3 years, and we determined their association with asthma at ages 7 and 10 years by using logistic regression. We computed test characteristics and measures of predictive performance to validate the API and compare it with simpler rules. Results The ability of the API to predict asthma in Leicester was comparable to Tucson: for the loose API, odds ratios for asthma at age 7 years were 5.2 in Leicester (5.5 in Tucson), and positive predictive values were 26% (26%). For the stringent API, these values were 8.2 (9.8) and 40% (48%). For the simpler rule early wheeze, corresponding values were 5.4 and 21%; for early frequent wheeze, 6.7 and 36%. The discriminative ability of all prediction rules was moderate (c statistic ≤ 0.7) and overall predictive performance low (scaled Brier score < 20%). Conclusion Predictive performance of the API in Leicester, although comparable to the original study, was modest and similar to prediction based only on preschool wheeze. This highlights the need for better prediction rules.

Item Type:

Journal Article (Original Article)

Division/Institute:

04 Faculty of Medicine > Pre-clinic Human Medicine > Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine (ISPM)

UniBE Contributor:

Leonardi, Nora; Spycher, Ben; Strippoli, Marie-Pierre and Kühni, Claudia

ISSN:

0091-6749

Publisher:

Mosby

Language:

English

Submitter:

Factscience Import

Date Deposited:

04 Oct 2013 14:22

Last Modified:

26 Sep 2017 22:20

Publisher DOI:

10.1016/j.jaci.2011.03.001

PubMed ID:

21453960

Web of Science ID:

000291048500023

BORIS DOI:

10.7892/boris.7392

URI:

https://boris.unibe.ch/id/eprint/7392 (FactScience: 212614)

Actions (login required)

Edit item Edit item
Provide Feedback