GetReal in network meta-analysis: a review of the methodology.

Efthimiou, Orestis; Debray, Thomas P A; van Valkenhoef, Gert; Trelle, Sven; Panayidou, Klea; Moons, Karel G M; Reitsma, Johannes B; Shang, Aijing; Salanti, Georgia (2016). GetReal in network meta-analysis: a review of the methodology. Research Synthesis Methods, 7(3), pp. 236-63. Wiley 10.1002/jrsm.1195

	Text Efthimiou ResSynthMethods 2016.pdf - Published Version Restricted to registered users only Available under License Publisher holds Copyright. Download (462kB)
Preview	Text Efthimiou ResSynthMethods 2016_postprint.pdf - Accepted Version Available under License Publisher holds Copyright. Download (425kB) | Preview

Pairwise meta-analysis is an established statistical tool for synthesizing evidence from multiple trials, but it is informative only about the relative efficacy of two specific interventions. The usefulness of pairwise meta-analysis is thus limited in real-life medical practice, where many competing interventions may be available for a certain condition and studies informing some of the pairwise comparisons may be lacking. This commonly encountered scenario has led to the development of network meta-analysis (NMA). In the last decade, several applications, methodological developments, and empirical studies in NMA have been published, and the area is thriving as its relevance to public health is increasingly recognized. This article presents a review of the relevant literature on NMA methodology aiming to pinpoint the developments that have appeared in the field. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Interest & Impact

Downloads

999 since deposited on 19 Jan 2016
128 in the past 12 months

Citations

5 Citations in Web of Science ®
6 Citations in Scopus

Search

in Google Scholar™

Services

Actions (login required)

Edit item

Actions (login required)

Edit item