Consensus and differences in primary radiotherapy for localized and locally advanced prostate cancer in Switzerland: A survey on patterns of practice

Panje, Cédric M; Dal Pra, Alan; Zilli, Thomas; R Zwahlen, Daniel; Papachristofilou, Alexandros; Herrera, Fernanda G; Matzinger, Oscar; Plasswilm, Ludwig; Putora, Paul Martin (2015). Consensus and differences in primary radiotherapy for localized and locally advanced prostate cancer in Switzerland: A survey on patterns of practice. Strahlentherapie und Onkologie, 191(10), pp. 778-786. Springer-Medizin-Verlag 10.1007/s00066-015-0849-8

[img] Text
art%3A10.1007%2Fs00066-015-0849-8.pdf - Published Version
Restricted to registered users only
Available under License Publisher holds Copyright.

Download (906kB) | Request a copy

INTRODUCTION External beam radiotherapy (EBRT), with or without androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), is an established treatment option for nonmetastatic prostate cancer. Despite high-level evidence from several randomized trials, risk group stratification and treatment recommendations vary due to contradictory or inconclusive data, particularly with regard to EBRT dose prescription and ADT duration. Our aim was to investigate current patterns of practice in primary EBRT for prostate cancer in Switzerland. MATERIALS AND METHODS Treatment recommendations on EBRT and ADT for localized and locally advanced prostate cancer were collected from 23 Swiss radiation oncology centers. Written recommendations were converted into center-specific decision trees, and analyzed for consensus and differences using a dedicated software tool. Additionally, specific radiotherapy planning and delivery techniques from the participating centers were assessed. RESULTS The most commonly prescribed radiation dose was 78 Gy (range 70-80 Gy) across all risk groups. ADT was recommended for intermediate-risk patients for 6 months in over 80 % of the centers, and for high-risk patients for 2 or 3 years in over 90 % of centers. For recommendations on combined EBRT and ADT treatment, consensus levels did not exceed 39 % in any clinical scenario. Arc-based intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) is implemented for routine prostate cancer radiotherapy by 96 % of the centers. CONCLUSION Among Swiss radiation oncology centers, considerable ranges of radiotherapy dose and ADT duration are routinely offered for localized and locally advanced prostate cancer. In the vast majority of cases, doses and durations are within the range of those described in current evidence-based guidelines.

Item Type:

Journal Article (Original Article)

Division/Institute:

04 Faculty of Medicine > Department of Haematology, Oncology, Infectious Diseases, Laboratory Medicine and Hospital Pharmacy (DOLS) > Clinic of Radiation Oncology

UniBE Contributor:

Dal Pra, Alan and Plasswilm, Ludwig

Subjects:

600 Technology > 610 Medicine & health

ISSN:

0179-7158

Publisher:

Springer-Medizin-Verlag

Language:

English

Submitter:

Beatrice Scheidegger

Date Deposited:

07 Apr 2016 11:39

Last Modified:

11 Apr 2016 01:54

Publisher DOI:

10.1007/s00066-015-0849-8

PubMed ID:

25986251

Uncontrolled Keywords:

Decision trees; Guidelines; Radiation oncology; Radiotherapy, intensity-modulated; Risk

BORIS DOI:

10.7892/boris.75355

URI:

https://boris.unibe.ch/id/eprint/75355

Actions (login required)

Edit item Edit item
Provide Feedback