Everolimus-eluting bioresorbable stent vs. durable polymer everolimus-eluting metallic stent in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: results of the randomized ABSORB ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction-TROFI II trial.

Sabaté, Manel; Windecker, Stephan; Iñiguez, Andres; Okkels-Jensen, Lisette; Cequier, Angel; Brugaletta, Salvatore; Hofma, Sjoerd H; Räber, Lorenz; Christiansen, Evald Høi; Suttorp, Maarten; Pilgrim, Thomas; Anne van Es, Gerrit; Sotomi, Yohei; García-García, Hector M; Onuma, Yoshinobu; Serruys, Patrick W (2015). Everolimus-eluting bioresorbable stent vs. durable polymer everolimus-eluting metallic stent in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: results of the randomized ABSORB ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction-TROFI II trial. European Heart Journal, 37(3), pp. 229-240. Oxford University Press 10.1093/eurheartj/ehv500

[img]
Preview
Text
229.full.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons: Attribution-Noncommercial (CC-BY-NC).

Download (801kB) | Preview

AIMS Patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) feature thrombus-rich lesions with large necrotic core, which are usually associated with delayed arterial healing and impaired stent-related outcomes. The use of bioresorbable vascular scaffolds (Absorb) has the potential to overcome these limitations owing to restoration of native vessel lumen and physiology at long term. The purpose of this randomized trial was to compare the arterial healing response at short term, as a surrogate for safety and efficacy, between the Absorb and the metallic everolimus-eluting stent (EES) in patients with STEMI. METHODS AND RESULTS ABSORB-STEMI TROFI II was a multicentre, single-blind, non-inferiority, randomized controlled trial. Patients with STEMI who underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention were randomly allocated 1:1 to treatment with the Absorb or EES. The primary endpoint was the 6-month optical frequency domain imaging healing score (HS) based on the presence of uncovered and/or malapposed stent struts and intraluminal filling defects. Main secondary endpoint included the device-oriented composite endpoint (DOCE) according to the Academic Research Consortium definition. Between 06 January 2014 and 21 September 2014, 191 patients (Absorb [n = 95] or EES [n = 96]; mean age 58.6 years old; 17.8% females) were enrolled at eight centres. At 6 months, HS was lower in the Absorb arm when compared with EES arm [1.74 (2.39) vs. 2.80 (4.44); difference (90% CI) -1.06 (-1.96, -0.16); Pnon-inferiority <0.001]. Device-oriented composite endpoint was also comparably low between groups (1.1% Absorb vs. 0% EES). One case of definite subacute stent thrombosis occurred in the Absorb arm (1.1% vs. 0% EES; P = ns). CONCLUSION Stenting of culprit lesions with Absorb in the setting of STEMI resulted in a nearly complete arterial healing which was comparable with that of metallic EES at 6 months. These findings provide the basis for further exploration in clinically oriented outcome trials.

Item Type:

Journal Article (Original Article)

Division/Institute:

04 Faculty of Medicine > Department of Cardiovascular Disorders (DHGE) > Clinic of Cardiology

UniBE Contributor:

Windecker, Stephan

Subjects:

600 Technology > 610 Medicine & health

ISSN:

0195-668X

Publisher:

Oxford University Press

Language:

English

Submitter:

Judith Liniger

Date Deposited:

27 Apr 2016 10:54

Last Modified:

27 Apr 2016 10:54

Publisher DOI:

10.1093/eurheartj/ehv500

PubMed ID:

26405232

Uncontrolled Keywords:

Bioresorbable scaffold, Optical coherence tomography, Randomized control study, ST elevation myocardial infarction

BORIS DOI:

10.7892/boris.75906

URI:

https://boris.unibe.ch/id/eprint/75906

Actions (login required)

Edit item Edit item
Provide Feedback