Computer-based summative assessment of clinical reasoning in clerkships: A mixed-method comparison of key feature problems with case-based multiple choice questions

Huwendiek, Sören; de Leng, B; vanderVleuten, C; Muijtjens, A; Dolmans, D (7 September 2015). Computer-based summative assessment of clinical reasoning in clerkships: A mixed-method comparison of key feature problems with case-based multiple choice questions (Unpublished). In: International Association for Medical Education (AMEE) Conference. Glasgow. 06.-09.09.2015.

Background: It is yet unclear if there are differences
between using electronic key feature problems (KFPs)
or electronic case-based multiple choice questions
(cbMCQ) for the assessment of clinical decision
making.
Summary of Work: Fifth year medical students were
exposed to clerkships which ended with a summative
exam. Assessment of knowledge per exam was done
by 6-9 KFPs, 9-20 cbMCQ and 9-28 MC questions. Each
KFP consisted of a case vignette and three key
features (KF) using “long menu” as question format.
We sought students’ perceptions of the KFPs and
cbMCQs in focus groups (n of students=39).
Furthermore statistical data of 11 exams (n of
students=377) concerning the KFPs and (cb)MCQs
were compared.
Summary of Results: The analysis of the focus groups
resulted in four themes reflecting students’
perceptions of KFPs and their comparison with
(cb)MCQ: KFPs were perceived as (i) more realistic, (ii)
more difficult, (iii) more motivating for the intense
study of clinical reasoning than (cb)MCQ and (iv)
showed an overall good acceptance when some
preconditions are taken into account. The statistical
analysis revealed that there was no difference in
difficulty; however KFP showed a higher
discrimination and reliability (G-coefficient) even when
corrected for testing times. Correlation of the
different exam parts was intermediate.
Conclusions: Students perceived the KFPs as more
motivating for the study of clinical reasoning.
Statistically KFPs showed a higher discrimination and
higher reliability than cbMCQs.
Take-home messages: Including KFPs with long menu
questions into summative clerkship exams seems to
offer positive educational effects.

Item Type:

Conference or Workshop Item (Abstract)

Division/Institute:

04 Faculty of Medicine > Medical Education > Institute for Medical Education > Assessment and Evaluation Unit (AAE)

UniBE Contributor:

Huwendiek, Sören

Language:

English

Submitter:

Eveline Götschmann-Meile

Date Deposited:

21 Apr 2016 13:56

Last Modified:

05 Dec 2022 14:55

URI:

https://boris.unibe.ch/id/eprint/81216

Actions (login required)

Edit item Edit item
Provide Feedback