Towards an Earlier Diagnosis of Primary Ciliary Dyskinesia: Which Patients Should Undergo Detailed Diagnostic Testing?

Kühni, Claudia E; Lucas, Jane S (2016). Towards an Earlier Diagnosis of Primary Ciliary Dyskinesia: Which Patients Should Undergo Detailed Diagnostic Testing? Annals of the American Thoracic Society, 13(8), pp. 1239-1243. American Thoracic Society 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201605-331PS

Preview

Text Kuehni AnnAmThoracSoc 2016.pdf - Accepted Version Available under License Publisher holds Copyright. Download (169kB) | Preview

Primary ciliary dyskinesia is a rare heterogeneous recessive genetic disorder of motile cilia, leading to chronic upper and lower respiratory symptoms. Prevalence is estimated at around 1:10,000, but many patients remain undiagnosed, while others receive the label incorrectly. Proper diagnosis is complicated by the fact that the key symptoms such as wet cough, chronic rhinitis and recurrent upper and lower respiratory infection, are common and nonspecific. There is no single gold standard test to diagnose PCD. Presently, the diagnosis is made by augmenting the medical history and physical examination with in patients with a compatible medical history following a demanding combination of tests including nasal nitric oxide, high- speed video microscopy, transmission electron microscopy, genetics, and ciliary culture. These tests are costly and need sophisticated equipment and experienced staff, restricting use to highly specialised centers. Therefore, it would be desirable to have a screening test for identifying those patients who should undergo detailed diagnostic testing. Three recent studies focused on potential screening tools: one paper assessed the validity of nasal nitric oxide for screening, and two studies developed new symptom-based screening tools. These simple tools are welcome, and hopefully remind physicians whom to refer for definitive testing. However, they have been developed in tertiary care settings, where 10 to 50% of tested patients have PCD. Sensitivity and specificity of the tools are reasonable, but positive and negative predictive values may be poor in primary or secondary care settings. While these studies take an important step forward towards an earlier diagnosis of PCD, more remains to be done before we have tools tailored to different health care settings.

Interest & Impact

Downloads

177 since deposited on 07 Jun 2016
40 in the past 12 months

Citations

5 Citations in Web of Science ®
6 Citations in Scopus

Search

in Google Scholar™

Services

Actions (login required)

Edit item

Actions (login required)

Edit item