Effect of PEEP, blood volume, and inspiratory hold maneuvers on venous return

Berger, David; Werner Möller, Per; Weber, Alberto; Bloch, Andreas; Bloechlinger, Stefan; Hänggi, Matthias; Sondergaard, Soren; Jakob, Stephan; Magder, Sheldon; Takala, Jukka (2016). Effect of PEEP, blood volume, and inspiratory hold maneuvers on venous return. American journal of physiology - heart and circulatory physiology, 311(3), H794-H806. American Physiological Society 10.1152/ajpheart.00931.2015

[img]
Preview
Text
2016 08 16 - Berger_PubMed 27422991_Effect of PEEP, blood volume, and 1 inspiratory hold maneuvers on venous return.pdf - Accepted Version
Available under License Publisher holds Copyright.

Download (11MB) | Preview
[img] Text
2016 09 15 - Berger_PubMed 27422991_Effect of PEEP, blood volume, and 1 inspiratory hold maneuvers on venous return.pdf - Published Version
Restricted to registered users only
Available under License Publisher holds Copyright.

Download (2MB) | Request a copy

According to Guyton's model of circulation, mean systemic filling pressure (MSFP), right atrial pressure (RAP), and resistance to venous return (RVR) determine venous return. MSFP has been estimated from inspiratory hold-induced changes in RAP and blood flow. We studied the impact of positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP) and blood volume on venous return and MSFP in pigs. MSFPRAO was measured by balloon occlusion of right atrium and MSFPinsp_hold extrapolated from RAP/pulmonary artery flow (QPA) relationships during inspiratory holds at PEEP 5 and 10 cmH2O, after bleeding and in hypervolemia. MSFPRAO increased with PEEP [PEEP 5, mean (SD) 12.9 (2.5) mmHg; PEEP 10 14.0 (2.6) mmHg, p=.002] without change in QPA [2.75 (.43) vs. 2.56 (.45) L/min, p=.094]. MSFPRAO decreased after bleeding and increased in hypervolemia [10.8 (2.2) and 16.4 (3.0) mmHg respectively p<.001], with parallel changes in QPA. Neither PEEP nor volume state altered RVR (p=.489). MSFPinsp_hold overestimated MSFPRAO [16.5 (5.8) mmHg vs.13.6 (3.2) mmHg; p=.001; mean difference 3.0 (5.1) mmHg]. Inspiratory holds shifted the RAP/QPA relationship rightwards in euvolemia because inferior vena cava flow (QIVC) recovered early after an inspiratory hold nadir. The QIVC nadir was lowest after bleeding [36 % (24 %) of pre-inspiratory hold at 15 cmH2O inspiratory pressure] and the QIVC recovery most complete at lowest inspiratory pressures independent of volume state [range from 80 (7) % after bleeding to 103 (8) % at PEEP 10 cmH2O of QIVC before inspiratory hold]. The QIVC recovery thus defends venous return, possibly via hepatosplanchnic vascular waterfall.

Item Type:

Journal Article (Original Article)

Division/Institute:

04 Faculty of Medicine > Department of Intensive Care, Emergency Medicine and Anaesthesiology (DINA) > Clinic of Intensive Care

UniBE Contributor:

Berger, David; Werner Möller, Per; Bloch, Andreas; Hänggi, Matthias; Jakob, Stephan and Takala, Jukka

Subjects:

600 Technology > 610 Medicine & health

ISSN:

0363-6135

Publisher:

American Physiological Society

Language:

English

Submitter:

Mirella Aeberhard

Date Deposited:

29 Aug 2016 08:37

Last Modified:

14 May 2019 14:39

Publisher DOI:

10.1152/ajpheart.00931.2015

PubMed ID:

27422991

Uncontrolled Keywords:

blood volume; cardiac output; mean systemic filling pressure; mechanical ventilation; right atrial pressure

BORIS DOI:

10.7892/boris.85971

URI:

https://boris.unibe.ch/id/eprint/85971

Actions (login required)

Edit item Edit item
Provide Feedback