Blinding in Physical Therapy Trials and Its Association with Treatment Effects: A Meta-epidemiological Study.

Armijo-Olivo, Susan; Fuentes, Jorge; Da Costa, Bruno R; Saltaji, Humam; Ha, Christine; Cummings, Greta G (2017). Blinding in Physical Therapy Trials and Its Association with Treatment Effects: A Meta-epidemiological Study. American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation, 96(1), pp. 34-44. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 10.1097/PHM.0000000000000521

[img]
Preview
Text
Armijo-Olivo AmJPhysMedRehabil 2016.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Publisher holds Copyright.

Download (1MB) | Preview
[img] Text
Armijo-Olivo AmJPhysMedRehabil 2017.pdf - Published Version
Restricted to registered users only
Available under License Publisher holds Copyright.

Download (450kB) | Request a copy

OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to examine whether blinding of participants, assessors, health providers, and statisticians have an effect on treatment effect estimates in physical therapy (PT) trials. DESIGN This was a meta-epidemiological study. Randomized controlled trials in PT were identified by searching the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews for meta-analyses of PT interventions. Assessments of blinding in PT trials were conducted independently following established guidelines. RESULTS Three hundred ninety-three trials and 43 meta-analyses that included 44,622 patients contributed to this study. Only a quarter of the trials were adequately blinded (n = 80; 20%). Most individual components of blinding as well as what they were blinded to were also poorly reported. Although trials with inappropriate blinding of assessors and participants tended to underestimate treatment effects when compared with trials with appropriate blinding of assessors and participants, the difference was not statistically significant (effect size, -0.07; 95% confidence interval, -0.22 to 0.08; effect size, -0.12; 95% confidence interval, -0.30 to 0.06, respectively). CONCLUSIONS The lack of statistical significance between blinding and effect sizes should not be interpreted as meaning that an impact of blinding on effect size is not present in PT. More empirical evidence in a larger sample is needed to determine which biases are likely to influence reported effect sizes of PT trials and under which conditions.

Item Type:

Journal Article (Original Article)

Division/Institute:

04 Faculty of Medicine > Medical Education > Institute of General Practice and Primary Care (BIHAM)

UniBE Contributor:

Da Costa, Bruno

Subjects:

600 Technology > 610 Medicine & health
300 Social sciences, sociology & anthropology > 360 Social problems & social services

ISSN:

0894-9115

Publisher:

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Language:

English

Submitter:

Doris Kopp Heim

Date Deposited:

16 Aug 2016 12:34

Last Modified:

08 Sep 2017 11:54

Publisher DOI:

10.1097/PHM.0000000000000521

PubMed ID:

27149591

BORIS DOI:

10.7892/boris.85976

URI:

https://boris.unibe.ch/id/eprint/85976

Actions (login required)

Edit item Edit item
Provide Feedback