The Narrative Uses of Evidence

Schlaufer, Caroline (2016). The Narrative Uses of Evidence. Policy studies journal, 46(1), pp. 90-118. Wiley 10.1111/psj.12174

Full text not available from this repository. (Request a copy)

When scientific evidence is used in policy controversies, it is always embedded in narrative stories. The Narrative Policy Framework (NPF) is an empirical framework used to study the role of narratives in public policy. While the NPF has considered the relationship between evidence and narratives from different angles, it has not used a consistent approach in examining how evidence is embedded in narratives. This article develops a categorization of narrative uses of evidence. A narrative use of evidence is defined by the different roles that evidence plays in the plot of a narrative depending on which narrative element is addressed by a given piece of evidence. To distinguish different narrative uses of evidence, the article examines how competing coalitions use the Program for International Student Assessment (PISA) study in Swiss direct-democratic campaigns on School policy. Quantitative and qualitative content analyses of newspaper articles and governmental documents show how evidence may relate to all main narrative elements and may play different roles in the plot of a narrative. The findings demonstrate significant differences in the narrative uses of PISA between coalitions related to the story types and narrative strategies that each coalition uses. Finally, the implications for future NPF research are discussed.

Item Type:

Journal Article (Original Article)


11 Centers of Competence > Center of Comptetence for Public Management (KPM)

UniBE Contributor:

Schlaufer, Caroline


300 Social sciences, sociology & anthropology > 320 Political science








Caroline Lea Schlaufer

Date Deposited:

09 Sep 2016 17:55

Last Modified:

08 Apr 2019 17:51

Publisher DOI:



Actions (login required)

Edit item Edit item
Provide Feedback