Calculating carbon changes in peat soils drained for forestry with four different profile-based methods

Krüger, Jan Paul; Alewell, Christine; Minkkinen, Kari; Szidat, Sönke; Leifeld, Jens (2016). Calculating carbon changes in peat soils drained for forestry with four different profile-based methods. Forest Ecology and Management, 381, pp. 29-36. Elsevier 10.1016/j.foreco.2016.09.006

	Text Krüger_C changes in drained peat soils (FEM 2016).pdf - Published Version Restricted to registered users only Available under License Publisher holds Copyright. Download (546kB)
Preview	Text Krüger et al 2016_Calculating carbon changes in peat soils drained for forestry with four different profile-based methods.pdf - Accepted Version Available under License Creative Commons: Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works (CC-BY-NC-ND). Download (1MB) | Preview

Boreal peatlands are an important carbon (C) sink. The effect of drainage for forestry on the soil C balance in those peatlands is a controversial debate. The Lakkasuo peatland, central Finland, comprise a minerotrophic and an ombrotrophic part, both partially drained for forestry. A pair-wise comparison was conducted and four different profile-based methods were applied to calculate the soil C balance. The first two methods used differences in ash content (I) between the upper and lower part of the profile and (II) between the drained and natural site of the peatland, respectively. The third method (III) used radiocarbon dated samples to calculate C accumulation rates at the natural site and compared these to the current C-stocks at the drained sites. The fourth method (IV) used radiocarbon dated samples to define a 1000-year layer in the profiles for comparing the C-stocks above this layer. Stable carbon isotope depth profiles, used for a qualitative assessment of the peatland status, identify both undrained site as undisturbed. All four methods indicate a C loss at the minerotrophic drained site but of different magnitude (0.057–0.272 kg C m-2 yr-1). At the ombrotrophic drained site both radiocarbon methods (III and IV) indicate a C gain (0.139–0.179 kg C m-2 yr-1) whereas methods I and II suggest a C loss (0.084–0.270 kg C m-2 yr-1). Method IV is considered the most stringent and robust one. Yet, the comparison of profile-based methods for C balance assessment suggests them to be applicable depending on sitespecific conditions of nutrient status and presence of a natural reference site.

Interest & Impact

Downloads

191 since deposited on 28 Sep 2016
17 in the past 12 months

Citations

5 Citations in Web of Science ®
6 Citations in Scopus

Search

in Google Scholar™

Services

Actions (login required)

Edit item

Actions (login required)

Edit item