Underpinning the precautionary principle with evidence: A spatialconcept for guiding wind power development in endangered species’habitats

Braunisch, Veronika; Coppes, Joy; Bächle, Stefan; Suchant, Rudi (2015). Underpinning the precautionary principle with evidence: A spatialconcept for guiding wind power development in endangered species’habitats. Journal for Nature Conservation, 24, pp. 31-40. Elsevier 10.1016/j.jnc.2015.01.003

[img] Text
Braunisch_JNatCon2015.pdf - Published Version
Restricted to registered users only
Available under License Publisher holds Copyright.

Download (1MB) | Request a copy
[img]
Preview
Text
Braunisch_JNatCon2015_Pprint.pdf - Accepted Version
Available under License Creative Commons: Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works (CC-BY-NC-ND).

Download (582kB) | Preview

The precautionary principle is an essential guideline in decision making, particularly for regulating novel developments with unknown or insufficiently proven environmental impact. However, due to the inherent component of uncertainty it has been widely criticized for being “unscientific”, i.e. hindering progress without sufficient evidence. The consequential postulation, that precautionary measures are only justified if the addressed threats are plausible and the measures reasonable, calls for methods to guide action in the face of uncertainty. Using the example of species conservation versus wind-farm construction, an expanding development with hypothesized – but unexplored – effects on our model species the capercaillie (Tetrao urogallus), we present an approach that aims at compensating the lack of knowledge about the threat itself by making best use of the available knowledge about the object at risk. By systematically combining information drawn from population monitoring and spatial modelling with population ecological thresholds, we identified areas of different functionality and importance to metapopulation persistence and connectivity. We integrated this information into a spatial concept defining four area-categories with different implications for wind power development. Highest priority was assigned to areas covering the spatial and functional requirements of a minimum viable population, i.e. sites where the plausibility for threat is highest, the uncertainty as regards importance for the population is lowest, and thus the justification for precautionary measures is strongest. This gradated approach may also enhance public acceptance, as it attempts to avoid either error-minimization bias (i.e. being too restrictive or permissive) the precautionary principle is frequently criticized for.

Item Type:

Journal Article (Original Article)

Division/Institute:

08 Faculty of Science > Department of Biology > Institute of Ecology and Evolution (IEE)
08 Faculty of Science > Department of Biology > Institute of Ecology and Evolution (IEE) > Conservation Biology

UniBE Contributor:

Braunisch, Veronika

Subjects:

500 Science > 570 Life sciences; biology
500 Science > 590 Animals (Zoology)

ISSN:

1617-1381

Publisher:

Elsevier

Language:

English

Submitter:

Olivier Roth

Date Deposited:

27 Sep 2016 11:00

Last Modified:

24 Jan 2017 02:30

Publisher DOI:

10.1016/j.jnc.2015.01.003

BORIS DOI:

10.7892/boris.88884

URI:

https://boris.unibe.ch/id/eprint/88884

Actions (login required)

Edit item Edit item
Provide Feedback