Why, when, and how general practitioners restore endodontically treated teeth: a representative survey in Germany.

Naumann, Michael; Neuhaus, Klaus; Kölpin, Manja; Seemann, Rainer (2016). Why, when, and how general practitioners restore endodontically treated teeth: a representative survey in Germany. Clinical oral investigations, 20(2), pp. 253-259. Springer 10.1007/s00784-015-1505-5

[img] Text
Why, when, and how general practitioners restore endodontically treated teeth a representative survey in Germany.pdf - Published Version
Restricted to registered users only until 1 April 2021.
Available under License Publisher holds Copyright.

Download (463kB) | Request a copy

OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to assess current opinions, applied techniques, and materials for the restoration of endodontically treated teeth (ETT) in a nationwide survey in Germany. MATERIAL AND METHODS Completed questionnaires from 1,648 dentists were returned (response rate 63%). RESULTS In general, posts were reported to be used more frequently (51%) for indirect restorations than for direct restorations (21%). Dentists restored anterior teeth (65%) more frequently with direct restorations than posterior teeth (48%). Compared to an earlier survey, fewer dentists stated that posttreatment stabilizes the remaining tooth structure. The ferrule effect as a key success factor was held by the vast majority of dentists (88%). A trend towards adhesive techniques both for post placement and core build-up was observed. Composite resins (49%) were reported to be used twice as much as zinc phosphate cement (24%) for the luting of posts; composite resins were the core build-up material of choice (75%). Amalgam was rarely used (0.2%). Irrespective of the final restoration, fiber posts were the most popular post material (46% for telescopic crowns vs. 69% for single crowns). CONCLUSION Adhesive composite core build-ups with and without fiber posts were the predominant treatment approach to restore ETT in Germany. There was widespread agreement with the ferrule effect as a key restorative success factor for indirect restorations. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE Today, it is general accepted that ferrule preparation is key. Glass-fiber posts appear to be most popular. Still different systems are used depending on type of final restoration, while the reasons to do so remain unclear.

Item Type:

Journal Article (Original Article)

Division/Institute:

04 Faculty of Medicine > School of Dental Medicine > Department of Preventive, Restorative and Pediatric Dentistry

UniBE Contributor:

Neuhaus, Klaus and Seemann, Rainer

Subjects:

600 Technology > 610 Medicine & health

ISSN:

1432-6981

Publisher:

Springer

Language:

English

Submitter:

Eveline Carmen Schuler

Date Deposited:

08 Mar 2017 08:37

Last Modified:

08 Mar 2017 08:37

Publisher DOI:

10.1007/s00784-015-1505-5

PubMed ID:

26082310

Uncontrolled Keywords:

Dowel; Post-and-core technique; Reconstruction; Root; Root-treated teeth

BORIS DOI:

10.7892/boris.91548

URI:

https://boris.unibe.ch/id/eprint/91548

Actions (login required)

Edit item Edit item
Provide Feedback