Simple modifications of mowing regime promote butterflies in extensively managed meadows: Evidence from field-scale experiments

Bruppacher, Laura; Arlettaz, Raphaël; Humbert, Jean-Yves; Pellet, Jérôme (2016). Simple modifications of mowing regime promote butterflies in extensively managed meadows: Evidence from field-scale experiments. Biological conservation, 196, pp. 196-202. Elsevier 10.1016/j.biocon.2016.02.018

[img] Text
Bruppacher_BioCon2016.pdf - Published Version
Restricted to registered users only
Available under License Publisher holds Copyright.

Download (591kB) | Request a copy

Restoring biodiversity-rich grasslands within cultivated matrices represents a real conservation challenge. One set of options consists in adopting less disruptive mowing regimes, as mowing impacts on invertebrates can be considerable. We experimentally tested the effect on butterfly populations of a spatio-temporal modification of mowing regimes within extensively managed meadows. The control regime (C) followed the standard Swiss agri-environment schemes (AES) regulation: no cutting before 15 June and no fertilisation. The second regime consisted of delaying (D) the first possible cut by one month (to 15 July). The third regime consisted in maintaining a 10–20% uncut grass refuge (R) during mowing operations. This experiment was replicated at 12 study sites across the Swiss lowlands, and applied yearly since 2010. Butterflieswere sampled in 2013. Butterflies generally benefitted from D- and R-regimes. Before the onset of mowing operations, both D- and R-regimes yielded higher butterfly densities (+70%) compared to the C-regime, demonstrating positive cumulative effects (i.e. carry-over effects from one year to the next), not only for the whole butterfly community, but also for resident, multivoltine, mono- and oligophagous species. After 15 June, densities were about six times higher in Dthan in C- and R-meadows until D-meadows were cut mid-July. Species richness of specialist butterflies was significantly higher in R-meadows (+60%) compared to C-meadows. This study is the first that demonstrates positive and cumulative effects of delaying the first cut or leaving a refuge on butterfly populations. It would be easy to implement these measures within European and Swiss AES regulations.

Item Type:

Journal Article (Original Article)

Division/Institute:

08 Faculty of Science > Department of Biology > Institute of Ecology and Evolution (IEE)
08 Faculty of Science > Department of Biology > Institute of Ecology and Evolution (IEE) > Conservation Biology

UniBE Contributor:

Arlettaz, Raphaël and Humbert, Jean-Yves

Subjects:

500 Science > 570 Life sciences; biology
300 Social sciences, sociology & anthropology > 330 Economics
500 Science > 590 Animals (Zoology)

ISSN:

0006-3207

Publisher:

Elsevier

Submitter:

Olivier Roth

Date Deposited:

21 Jun 2017 10:04

Last Modified:

21 Jun 2017 10:04

Publisher DOI:

10.1016/j.biocon.2016.02.018

BORIS DOI:

10.7892/boris.93707

URI:

https://boris.unibe.ch/id/eprint/93707

Actions (login required)

Edit item Edit item
Provide Feedback