Mentzelopoulos, Spyros D; Bossaert, Leo; Raffay, Violetta; Askitopoulou, Helen; Perkins, Gavin D; Greif, Robert; Haywood, Kirstie; Van de Voorde, Patrick; Xanthos, Theodoros (2016). A survey of key opinion leaders on ethical resuscitation practices in 31 European Countries. Resuscitation, 100, pp. 11-17. Elsevier Science Ireland 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2015.12.010
Text
1-s2.0-S0300957216000125-main.pdf - Published Version Restricted to registered users only Available under License Publisher holds Copyright. Download (549kB) |
BACKGROUND
Europe is a patchwork of 47 countries with legal, cultural, religious, and economic differences. A prior study suggested variation in ethical resuscitation/end-of-life practices across Europe. This study aimed to determine whether this variation has evolved, and whether the application of ethical practices is associated with emergency care organisation.
METHODS
A questionnaire covering four domains of resuscitation ethics was developed based on consensus: (A) Approaches to end-of-life care and family presence during cardiopulmonary resuscitation; (B) Determinants of access to best resuscitation and post-resuscitation care; (C) Diagnosis of death and organ donation (D) Emergency care organisation. The questionnaire was sent to representatives of 32 countries. Responses to 4-choice or 2-choice questions pertained to local legislation and common practice. Positive responses were graded by 1 and negative responses by 0; grades were reconfirmed/corrected by respondents from 31/32 countries (97%). For each resuscitation/end-of-life practice a subcomponent score was calculated by grades' summation. Subcomponent scores' summation resulted in domain total scores.
RESULTS
Data from 31 countries were analysed. Domains A, B, and D total scores exhibited substantial variation (respective total score ranges, 1-41, 0-19 and 9-32), suggesting variable interpretation and application of bioethical principles, and particularly of autonomy. Linear regression revealed a significant association between domain A and D total scores (adjusted r(2)=0.42, P<0.001).
CONCLUSIONS
According to key experts, ethical practices and emergency care still vary across Europe. There is need for harmonised legislation, and improved, education-based interpretation/application of bioethical principles. Better application of ethical practices may be associated with improved emergency care organisation.
Item Type: |
Journal Article (Original Article) |
---|---|
Division/Institute: |
04 Faculty of Medicine > Department of Intensive Care, Emergency Medicine and Anaesthesiology (DINA) > Clinic and Policlinic for Anaesthesiology and Pain Therapy |
UniBE Contributor: |
Greif, Robert |
Subjects: |
600 Technology > 610 Medicine & health |
ISSN: |
0300-9572 |
Publisher: |
Elsevier Science Ireland |
Language: |
English |
Submitter: |
Jeannie Wurz |
Date Deposited: |
22 Feb 2017 10:09 |
Last Modified: |
05 Dec 2022 15:02 |
Publisher DOI: |
10.1016/j.resuscitation.2015.12.010 |
PubMed ID: |
26776899 |
Uncontrolled Keywords: |
Bioethics; Cardiac arrest; Emergency care; End of life care; Resuscitation |
BORIS DOI: |
10.7892/boris.93956 |
URI: |
https://boris.unibe.ch/id/eprint/93956 |