The suitability of tax data to study trends in inequality—A theoretical and empirical review with tax data from Switzerland

Hümbelin, Oliver; Farys, Rudolf (2016). The suitability of tax data to study trends in inequality—A theoretical and empirical review with tax data from Switzerland. Research in social stratification and mobility, 44, pp. 136-150. Elsevier 10.1016/j.rssm.2016.04.004

[img] Text
S0276562416300579 - Published Version
Restricted to registered users only
Available under License Publisher holds Copyright.

Download (66kB) | Request a copy
[img]
Preview
Text
EN72-web.pdf - Accepted Version
Available under License Publisher holds Copyright.

Download (853kB) | Preview

In many countries results of inequality trends are ambiguous, because different methodological approaches blur the picture or because reliable data are not available. In this paper we assess whether tax data are suitable for the analysis of inequality trends. We do so by comparing tax data measurement concepts concerning income definition, statistical units and population coverage to theoretical-ideal concepts. We use Swiss tax data as an example to obtain a sense of the general direction and magnitude of potential biases and advantages. We therefore estimate the impact of the methodological options for measuring inequality based on tax data by comparing aggregated tax statistics and micro tax data results to corresponding results taken from surveys. While there are clear advantages to using tax data, such as long-term availability and reliable population coverage in more recent years, there are also drawbacks that lead to an overestimation of inequality based on aggregated tax statistics and hinder comparability over time. In sum, tax data are a source that should be used with care, but nonetheless seem to be indispensable for the analysis of inequality. Finally our estimations raise doubts about whether surveys are able to adequately track changes in income distribution tails, due to the undercoverage of very poor and very rich households.

Item Type:

Journal Article (Original Article)

Division/Institute:

03 Faculty of Business, Economics and Social Sciences > Social Sciences > Institute of Sociology
03 Faculty of Business, Economics and Social Sciences > Social Sciences

UniBE Contributor:

Hümbelin, Oliver and Farys, Rudolf

Subjects:

300 Social sciences, sociology & anthropology
300 Social sciences, sociology & anthropology > 310 Statistics
300 Social sciences, sociology & anthropology > 330 Economics

ISSN:

0276-5624

Publisher:

Elsevier

Language:

English

Submitter:

Oliver Hümbelin

Date Deposited:

04 Jul 2017 13:40

Last Modified:

27 Apr 2018 02:30

Publisher DOI:

10.1016/j.rssm.2016.04.004

BORIS DOI:

10.7892/boris.94888

URI:

https://boris.unibe.ch/id/eprint/94888

Actions (login required)

Edit item Edit item
Provide Feedback