Single-staged vs. two-staged implant placement using bone ring technique in vertically deficient alveolar ridges - Part 1: histomorphometric and micro-CT analysis

Nakahara, Ken; Haga-Tsujimura, Maiko; Sawada, Kosaku; Kobayashi, Eizaburo; Mottini, Matthias; Schaller, Benoît; Saulacic, Nikola (2016). Single-staged vs. two-staged implant placement using bone ring technique in vertically deficient alveolar ridges - Part 1: histomorphometric and micro-CT analysis. Clinical oral implants research, 27(11), pp. 1384-1391. Wiley 10.1111/clr.12751

[img] Text
Nakahara_et_al-2016-Clinical_Oral_Implants_Research-1.pdf - Published Version
Restricted to registered users only
Available under License Publisher holds Copyright.

Download (1MB) | Request a copy

BACKGROUND: Simultaneous implant placement with bone grafting shortens the overall treatment period, but might lead to the peri-implant bone loss or even implant failure. The aim of this study was to compare the single-staged to two-staged implant placement using the bone ring technique. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Four standardized alveolar bone defects were made in the mandibles of nine dogs. Dental implants (Straumann BL® , Basel, Switzerland) were inserted simultaneously with bone ring technique in test group and after 6 months of healing period in control group. Animals of both groups were euthanized at 3 and 6 months of osseointegration period. The harvested samples were analyzed by means of histology and micro-CT. RESULTS: The amount of residual bone decreased while the amount of new bone increased up to 9 months of healing period. All morphometric parameters remained stable between 3 and 6 months of osseointegration period within groups. Per a given time point, median area of residual bone graft was higher in test group and area of new bone in control group. The volume of bone ring was greater in test than in control group, reaching the significance at 6 months of osseointegration period (P = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: In the present type of bone defect, single-staged implant placement may be potentially useful to shorten an overall treatment period.

Item Type:

Journal Article (Original Article)

Division/Institute:

04 Faculty of Medicine > Pre-clinic Human Medicine > BioMedical Research (DBMR) > DBMR Forschung Mu35 > Forschungsgruppe Schädel-, Kiefer- und Gesichtschirurgie
04 Faculty of Medicine > Pre-clinic Human Medicine > BioMedical Research (DBMR) > DBMR Forschung Mu35 > Forschungsgruppe Schädel-, Kiefer- und Gesichtschirurgie

04 Faculty of Medicine > Department of Head Organs and Neurology (DKNS) > Clinic of Craniomaxillofacial Surgery

UniBE Contributor:

Nakahara, Ken; Haga-Tsujimura, Maiko; Sawada, Kosaku; Kobayashi, Eizaburo; Mottini, Matthias; Schaller, Benoît and Saulacic, Nikola

Subjects:

600 Technology > 610 Medicine & health

ISSN:

0905-7161

Publisher:

Wiley

Language:

English

Submitter:

Caroline Dominique Zürcher

Date Deposited:

17 May 2017 11:54

Last Modified:

19 May 2017 09:40

Publisher DOI:

10.1111/clr.12751

PubMed ID:

26833804

Uncontrolled Keywords:

animal experiments; bone implant interactions; bone regeneration; guided tissue regeneration; surgical techniques

BORIS DOI:

10.7892/boris.95112

URI:

https://boris.unibe.ch/id/eprint/95112

Actions (login required)

Edit item Edit item
Provide Feedback