Surgical Regenerative Treatments for Peri-Implantitis: Meta-analysis of Recent Findings in a Systematic Literature Review

Daugela, Povilas; Cicciù, Marco; Saulacic, Nikola (2016). Surgical Regenerative Treatments for Peri-Implantitis: Meta-analysis of Recent Findings in a Systematic Literature Review. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Research, 7(3), e15. Kaunas 10.5037/jomr.2016.7315

[img]
Preview
Text
v7n3e15.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons: Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works (CC-BY-NC-ND).

Download (2MB) | Preview

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of the present study was to systematically review the literature on the surgical regenerative treatment of the peri-implantitis and to determine an effective therapeutic predictable option for their clinical management. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study searched MEDLINE and EMBASE databases from 2006 to 2016. Clinical human studies that had reported changes in probing depth (PD) and/or bleeding on probing (BOP) and/or radiologic marginal bone level (RBL) changes after peri-implantitis surgical treatment at 12-month follow-up or longer were included accordingly to PRISMA guidelines. RESULTS: The initial search obtained 883 citations. After screening and determination of eligibility, 18 articles were included in the review. The meta-analysis of selected studies revealed that the weighted mean RBL fill was 1.97 mm (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.58 to 2.35 mm), PD reduction was 2.78 mm (95% CI = 2.31 to 3.25 mm), and BOP reduced by 52.5% (95% CI = 41.6 to 63.1%). Defect fill in studies using and not using barrier membranes for graft coverage was 1.86 mm (95% CI = 1.36 to 2.36 mm) and 2.12 mm (95% CI = 1.46 to 2.78 mm) correspondingly. High heterogeneity among the studies regarding defects morphology, surgical protocols, and selection of biomaterials were found. CONCLUSIONS: All included studies underlined an improvement of clinical conditions after the surgical regenerative treatment of peri-implantitis, however, there is a lack of scientific evidence in the literature regarding the superiority of the regenerative versus non-regenerative surgical treatment. The presence of a barrier membrane or submergence in the regenerative procedure does not seem to be fundamental in order to obtain clinical success of the surgery. KEYWORDS: alveolar bone grafting; alveolar bone loss; biocompatible materials; bone regeneration; oral surgery; peri-implantitis

Item Type:

Journal Article (Review Article)

Division/Institute:

04 Faculty of Medicine > Pre-clinic Human Medicine > BioMedical Research (DBMR) > DBMR Forschung Mu35 > Forschungsgruppe Schädel-, Kiefer- und Gesichtschirurgie
04 Faculty of Medicine > Pre-clinic Human Medicine > BioMedical Research (DBMR) > DBMR Forschung Mu35 > Forschungsgruppe Schädel-, Kiefer- und Gesichtschirurgie

04 Faculty of Medicine > Department of Head Organs and Neurology (DKNS) > Clinic of Craniomaxillofacial Surgery

UniBE Contributor:

Saulacic, Nikola

Subjects:

600 Technology > 610 Medicine & health

ISSN:

2029-283X

Publisher:

Kaunas

Language:

English

Submitter:

Caroline Dominique Zürcher

Date Deposited:

22 May 2017 10:01

Last Modified:

22 Sep 2017 15:44

Publisher DOI:

10.5037/jomr.2016.7315

PubMed ID:

27833740

Uncontrolled Keywords:

alveolar bone grafting; alveolar bone loss; biocompatible materials; bone regeneration; oral surgery; peri-implantitis

BORIS DOI:

10.7892/boris.95259

URI:

https://boris.unibe.ch/id/eprint/95259

Actions (login required)

Edit item Edit item
Provide Feedback