Schaub, Hans-Peter (2012). Maximising Direct Democracy – by Popular Assemblies or by Ballot Votes? Swiss political science review / Schweizerische Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft, 18(3), pp. 305-331. Wiley 10.1111/j.1662-6370.2012.02075.x
![[img]](https://boris.unibe.ch/style/images/fileicons/text.png) |
Text
SCHAUB-2012-Swiss_Political_Science_Review.pdf - Published Version Restricted to registered users only Available under License Publisher holds Copyright. Download (932kB) |
According to a widespread but empirically hitherto untested perception, assembly democracy is the ideal-typical form for direct democracy. This paper examines whether this perception coincides with empirical evidence by systematically comparing the actual extent of citizens’ direct-democratic involvement in assembly democracies and in ballot-box democracies. A longitudinal and cross-sectional analysis of new data on the Swiss cantons reveals strikingly clear patterns: cantons with popular assemblies provide citizens with more and more easily accessible direct-democratic rights, and they hold popular votes more frequently. On the other hand, cantons with ballot-box voting are more successful in involving the citizens in direct-democratic decision-making with respect to turnout rates.
Item Type: |
Journal Article (Original Article) |
|---|---|
Division/Institute: |
03 Faculty of Business, Economics and Social Sciences > Social Sciences > Institute of Political Science |
UniBE Contributor: |
Schaub, Hans-Peter |
Subjects: |
300 Social sciences, sociology & anthropology > 320 Political science |
ISSN: |
1424-7755 |
Publisher: |
Wiley |
Language: |
English |
Submitter: |
Hans-Peter Schaub |
Date Deposited: |
02 Jun 2017 08:46 |
Last Modified: |
05 Dec 2022 15:04 |
Publisher DOI: |
10.1111/j.1662-6370.2012.02075.x |
Web of Science ID: |
000308876800002 |
BORIS DOI: |
10.7892/boris.98819 |
URI: |
https://boris.unibe.ch/id/eprint/98819 |
Actions (login required)
 |
Edit item |