EEG synchronization measures are early outcome predictors in comatose patients after cardiac arrest.

Zubler, Frédéric Alexis Rudolf; Steimer, Andreas; Kurmann, Rebekka; Bandarabadi, Mojtaba; Novy, Jan; Gast, Heidemarie; Oddo, Mauro; Schindler, Kaspar Anton; Rossetti, Andrea O (2017). EEG synchronization measures are early outcome predictors in comatose patients after cardiac arrest. Clinical neurophysiology, 128(4), pp. 635-642. Elsevier 10.1016/j.clinph.2017.01.020

Text 1-s2.0-S1388245717300421-main.pdf - Published Version Restricted to registered users only Available under License Publisher holds Copyright. Download (457kB)

OBJECTIVE

Outcome prognostication in comatose patients after cardiac arrest (CA) remains a major challenge. Here we investigated the prognostic value of combinations of linear and non-linear bivariate EEG synchronization measures.

METHODS

94 comatose patients with EEG within 24h after CA were included. Clinical outcome was assessed at 3months using the Cerebral Performance Categories (CPC). EEG synchronization between the left and right parasagittal, and between the frontal and parietal brain regions was assessed with 4 different quantitative measures (delta power asymmetry, cross-correlation, mutual information, and transfer entropy). 2/3 of patients were used to assess the predictive power of all possible combinations of these eight features (4 measures×2 directions) using cross-validation. The predictive power of the best combination was tested on the remaining 1/3 of patients.

RESULTS

The best combination for prognostication consisted of 4 of the 8 features, and contained linear and non-linear measures. Predictive power for poor outcome (CPC 3-5), measured with the area under the ROC curve, was 0.84 during cross-validation, and 0.81 on the test set. At specificity of 1.0 the sensitivity was 0.54, and the accuracy 0.81.

CONCLUSION

Combinations of EEG synchronization measures can contribute to early prognostication after CA. In particular, combining linear and non-linear measures is important for good predictive power.

SIGNIFICANCE

Quantitative methods might increase the prognostic yield of currently used multi-modal approaches.

Interest & Impact

Downloads

2 since deposited on 27 Jul 2017
0 in the past 12 months

Citations

5 Citations in Web of Science ®
6 Citations in Scopus

Search

in Google Scholar™

Services

Actions (login required)

Edit item

Actions (login required)

Edit item