Loss of resistance: A randomised controlled trial assessing four low-fidelity epidural puncture simulators.

Pedersen, Tina Heidi; Meuli, Jonas; Plazikowski, Eike Jan; Buttenberg, Maximilian; Kleine-Brüggeney, Maren; Seidl, Christian Andreas; Theiler, Lorenz; Greif, Robert (2017). Loss of resistance: A randomised controlled trial assessing four low-fidelity epidural puncture simulators. European journal of anaesthesiology, 34(9), pp. 602-608. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000640

[img] Text
00003643-201709000-00006.pdf - Published Version
Restricted to registered users only
Available under License Publisher holds Copyright.

Download (328kB) | Request a copy

BACKGROUND Detecting loss of resistance (LOR) can either be taught with dedicated simulators, with a cost ranging from &OV0556;1500 to 3000, or with the 'Greengrocer's Model', requiring simply a banana. OBJECTIVES The purpose of this study was to compare three dedicated epidural puncture training simulators and a banana in their ability to simulate LOR. Our hypothesis was that there was a difference between the four simulators when comparing the detection of LOR. DESIGN Single-blinded, randomised, controlled study. SETTING Department of Anaesthesiology and Pain Therapy, Bern University Hospital, Switzerland. PARTICIPANTS Fifty-five consultant anaesthesiologists. INTERVENTIONS The participants were asked to insert an epidural catheter in four different epidural puncture training simulators: Lumbar Puncture Simulator II (Kyoto Kagaku, Kyoto, Japan), Lumbar Epidural Injection Trainer (Erler-Zimmer, Lauf, Germany), Normal Adult Lumbar Puncture/Epidural Tissue (Simulab Corp., Seattle, Washington, USA) and a banana. The simulators were placed in identical boxes to blind the participants. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The primary outcome was the detection of LOR rated on a 100-mm visual analogue scale, in which 0 mm represented 'completely unrealistic' and 100 mm represented 'indistinguishable from a real patient'. RESULTS The mean visual analogue scale scores for LOR in the four simulators were significantly different: 60 ± 25 mm [95% confidence interval (CI), 55 to 65 mm], 50 ± 29 mm (95% CI, 44 to 55 mm), 64 ± 24 mm (95% CI, 58 to 69 mm) and 49 ± 32 mm (95% CI, 44 to 54 mm); P less than 0.001, Friedman test. CONCLUSION Two of the three dedicated epidural simulators were rated more realistic in detecting LOR than the banana, but some participants preferred the banana to the other three simulators. Given the relative cost of a banana compared with a dedicated simulator, we suggest that a banana be used to teach the technique of LOR for epidural puncture. TRIAL REGISTRATION KEK Nr: Req-2015-z087.

Item Type:

Journal Article (Original Article)

Division/Institute:

04 Faculty of Medicine > Department of Intensive Care, Emergency Medicine and Anaesthesiology (DINA) > Clinic and Policlinic for Anaesthesiology and Pain Therapy

UniBE Contributor:

Pedersen, Tina Heidi; Plazikowski, Eike Jan; Kleine-Brüggeney, Maren; Seidl, Christian Andreas; Theiler, Lorenz and Greif, Robert

Subjects:

600 Technology > 610 Medicine & health

ISSN:

0265-0215

Publisher:

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Language:

English

Submitter:

Jeannie Wurz

Date Deposited:

25 Oct 2017 08:20

Last Modified:

04 Dec 2018 15:21

Publisher DOI:

10.1097/EJA.0000000000000640

PubMed ID:

28437262

BORIS DOI:

10.7892/boris.99513

URI:

https://boris.unibe.ch/id/eprint/99513

Actions (login required)

Edit item Edit item
Provide Feedback