COMPETITIVE TESTING THE WHO 2010 VS THE WHO 2017 GRADING OF PANCREAS NEUROENDOCRINE NEOPLASIA: DATA FROM A LARGE INTERNATIONAL COHORT STUDY.

Rindi, Guido; Klersy, Catherine; Albarello, Luca; Baudin, Eric; Bianchi, Antonio; Büchler, Markus W; Caplin, Martyn; Couvelard, Anne; Cros, Jérôme; de Herder, Wouter W; Delle Fave, Gianfranco; Doglioni, Claudio; Federspiel, Birgitte; Fischer, Lars; Fusai, Giuseppe; Gavazzi, Francesca; Hansen, Carsten; Inzani, Frediano; Jann, Henning; Komminoth, Paul; ... (2018). COMPETITIVE TESTING THE WHO 2010 VS THE WHO 2017 GRADING OF PANCREAS NEUROENDOCRINE NEOPLASIA: DATA FROM A LARGE INTERNATIONAL COHORT STUDY. Neuroendocrinology, 107(4), pp. 375-386. Karger 10.1159/000494355

Text 000494355.pdf - Published Version Restricted to registered users only Available under License Publisher holds Copyright. Download (563kB) | Request a copy

<br>Background: the World Health Organization (WHO) and the American Joint Cancer Committee (AJCC) modified the grading of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms from a three-tiers (WHO-AJCC 2010) to a four-tiers system by introducing the novel category of NET G3 (WHO-AJCC 2017).

OBJECTIVES

This study aims at validating the WHO-AJCC 2017 and identifying the most effective grading system.

METHOD

2102 patients were enrolled; entry criteria were i) performed surgery; ii) at least two years of follow-up; iii) observation time up to 2015. Data from 34 variables were collected; grading was assessed and compared for efficacy by statistical means including Kaplan Meier method, Cox regression analysis, Harrell's C statistics and Royston's explained variation in univariable and multivariable analyses.

RESULTS

At descriptive analysis, the two grading systems demonstrated statistically significant differences for the major category sex but not for age groups. At Cox regression analysis, both grading systems showed statistically significant differences between grades for OS and EFS, however no statistically significant difference was observed between the two G3 classes of WHO-AJCC 2017. At multivariable analysis for the two models fitted to compare efficacy, the two grading systems performed equally well with substantially similar optimal discrimination and well-explained variation for both OS and EFS. The WHO-AJCC 2017 grading system retained statistically significant difference between the two G3 classes for OS but not for EFS.

CONCLUSIONS

the WHO-AJCC 2017 grading is at least equally performing as the WHO-AJCC 2010 but allows the successful identification of the most aggressive PanNET subgroup. Grading is confirmed as probably the most powerful tool for patient survival prediction. <br>.

Interest & Impact

Downloads

0 since deposited on 22 Oct 2018
0 in the past 12 months

Citations

5 Citations in Web of Science ®
6 Citations in Scopus

Search

in Google Scholar™

Services

Actions (login required)

Edit item

Actions (login required)

Edit item