Suenaga, Mitsukuni; Schirripa, Marta; Cao, Shu; Zhang, Wu; Yang, Dongyun; Cremolini, Chiara; Lonardi, Sara; Bergamo, Francesca; Ning, Yang; Yamamoto, Noriko; Okazaki, Satoshi; Berger, Martin Dave; Miyamoto, Yuji; Gopez, Roel; Barzi, Afsaneh; Yamaguchi, Toshiharu; Stintzing, Sebastian; Heinemann, Volker; Loupakis, Fotios; Falcone, Alfredo; ... (2018). Potential role of PIN1 genotypes in predicting benefit from oxaliplatin-based and irinotecan-based treatment in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. The pharmacogenomics journal, 18(5), pp. 623-632. Nature Publishing Group 10.1038/s41397-018-0030-8
|
Text
nihms959884.pdf - Accepted Version Available under License Publisher holds Copyright. Download (845kB) | Preview |
|
Text
s41397-018-0030-8.pdf - Published Version Restricted to registered users only Available under License Publisher holds Copyright. Download (1MB) |
PIN1-mediated substrate isomerization plays a role in the repair of DNA double-strand breaks. We hypothesized that genetic polymorphisms in PIN1-related pathways may affect tumor sensitivity to oxaliplatin or irinotecan in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients. We analyzed genomic DNA from five cohorts of mCRC patients (total 950) treated with different first-line treatments: oxaliplatin cohorts 1 (n = 146) and 2 (n = 70); irinotecan cohorts 1 (n = 228), and 2 (n = 276); and combination cohort (n = 230). Single nucleotide polymorphisms of candidate genes were analyzed by PCR-based direct sequencing. In the oxaliplatin cohort 1, patients carrying any PIN1 rs2233678 C allele had shorter progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) than the G/G variant (PFS, 7.4 vs. 15.0 months, hazard ratio [HR] 3.24, P < 0.001; OS, 16.9 vs. 31.5 months, HR: 2.38, P = 0.003). In contrast, patients with C allele had longer median PFS than patients with G/G (11.9 vs. 9.4 months, HR: 0.64, 95%CI: 0.45-0.91, P = 0.009) in the irinotecan cohort 1. No significant differences were observed in the combination cohort. In comparison between the irinotecan cohort 1 and combination cohort, the patients carrying the G/G variant benefit greatly from the combination compared with irinotecan-based regimen (PFS, 11.6 vs. 9.4 months, HR 0.61, 95%CI: 0.47-0.78, P < 0.001; OS, 30.6 vs. 24.0 months, HR 0.79, 95%CI: 0.62-1.02, P = 0.060), while no significant difference was shown in any C allele. Germline PIN1 polymorphisms may predict clinical outcomes in mCRC patients receiving oxaliplatin-based or irinotecan-based therapy, and identify specific populations favorable to oxaliplatin plus irinotecan combination therapy.
Item Type: |
Journal Article (Original Article) |
---|---|
Division/Institute: |
04 Faculty of Medicine > Department of Haematology, Oncology, Infectious Diseases, Laboratory Medicine and Hospital Pharmacy (DOLS) > Clinic of Medical Oncology |
UniBE Contributor: |
Berger, Martin Dave |
Subjects: |
600 Technology > 610 Medicine & health |
ISSN: |
1473-1150 |
Publisher: |
Nature Publishing Group |
Language: |
English |
Submitter: |
Rebeka Gerber |
Date Deposited: |
28 Feb 2019 14:59 |
Last Modified: |
05 Dec 2022 15:24 |
Publisher DOI: |
10.1038/s41397-018-0030-8 |
PubMed ID: |
29925895 |
BORIS DOI: |
10.7892/boris.124091 |
URI: |
https://boris.unibe.ch/id/eprint/124091 |