Tumor architecture exerts no bias on nuclear grading in breast cancer diagnosis

Mora, Braulio; Bombari, Dario; Schaefer, Stephan C.; Schmidt, Marcus; Delaloye, Jean-Francois; Mast, Fred W.; Lehr, Hans-Anton (2012). Tumor architecture exerts no bias on nuclear grading in breast cancer diagnosis. Virchows Archiv, 461(4), pp. 399-403. Berlin: Springer 10.1007/s00428-012-1304-1

Preview

Text s00428-012-1304-1.pdf - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons: Attribution (CC-BY). Download (799kB) | Preview

We recently reported that nuclear grading in prostate cancer is subject to a strong confirmation bias induced by the tumor architecture. We now wondered whether a similar bias governs nuclear grading in breast carcinoma. An unannounced test was performed at a pathology conference. Pathologists were asked to grade nuclei in a PowerPoint presentation. Circular high power fields of 27 invasive ductal carcinomas were shown, superimposed over low power background images of either tubule-rich or tubule-poor carcinomas. We found (a) that diagnostic reproducibility of nuclear grades was poor to moderate (weighed kappa values between 0.07 and 0.54, 27 cases, 44 graders), but (b) that nuclear grades were not affected by the tumor architecture. We speculate that the categorized grading in breast cancer, separating tubule formation, nuclear pleomorphism, and mitotic figure counts in a combined three tier score, prevents the bias that architecture exerts on nuclear grades in less well-controlled situations.

Interest & Impact

Downloads

22 since deposited on 04 Oct 2013
10 in the past 12 months

Citations

5 Citations in Web of Science ®
6 Citations in Scopus

Search

in Google Scholar™

Services

Actions (login required)

Edit item

Actions (login required)

Edit item