Respelling Names. The long vowels /i, u, ü/ and the New High German Diphthongisation in Swiss names

Kistler, Simon (2020). Respelling Names. The long vowels /i, u, ü/ and the New High German Diphthongisation in Swiss names. In: Löfdahl, Maria; Waldispühl, Michelle; Wenner, Lena (eds.) Namn i skrift. Names in Writing. Handlingar från NORNAs 48:e symposium i Göteborg den 29–30 november 2018. Meijerbergs arkiv för Svensk ordforskning: Vol. 44 (pp. 177-194). Göteborg: Meijerbergs institut för svensk etymologisk forskning Göteborgs universitet

Text Respelling_names._The_long_vowels__i__u_____and_the_New_High_German_Diphthongisation_in_Swiss_names.pdf - Published Version Restricted to registered users only Available under License Publisher holds Copyright. Download (1MB) | Request a copy

Starting from the family of the Swiss Indo-European linguist Eduard Schwyzer (1874–1943) that changed their name from Schweizer to Schwyzer in 1899, the aim of this contribution is to illustrate the history of a spelling problem.1 The Middle High German sounds ī, ū and ǖ, which in great parts of the German-speaking area were affected by the New High German Diphthongisation (ī <i/y> > ai <ei> etc.), remained unchanged in the Swiss German dialects. Adopting diphthongised Standard German as the written language in Switzerland thus lead to a manifest discrepancy between the spoken and the written form.
Based on data from the onomastic research unit (‘Forschungsstelle für Namenkunde’) at the University of Bern and focussing on the frequent place-name element Wil, I will offer a historical overview of the graphematics of the respective sounds as they appear in names and contrast the findings to the developments in the appellative sphere.
I will describe the emergence of <y> spellings in the 15th and 16th centuries and the subsequent adoption of digraphic <ei> from the 17th century on, which are changes that affected names and common words alike. It was not until around the year 1800 that onymic spelling obtained its own orthographic status, which maintained a closer connection to the dialectal pronunciation, unlike the spelling of the general vocabulary, which follows the international standard.
The paper concludes with a discussion of possible motifs for the Schwyzer family’s name change in its historical context and a general survey of the developments that have taken place since the year 1900.

Interest & Impact

Downloads

2 since deposited on 08 Mar 2021
1 in the past 12 months

Citations

5 Citations in Web of Science ®
6 Citations in Scopus

Search

in Google Scholar™

Services

Actions (login required)

Edit item

Actions (login required)

Edit item