Katzner, Todd E.; Arlettaz, Raphaël (2020). Evaluating Contributions of Recent Tracking-Based Animal Movement Ecology to Conservation Management. Frontiers in ecology and evolution, 7(519) Frontiers Media 10.3389/fevo.2019.00519
|
Text
Katzner_FroEcoEvo2020.pdf - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons: Attribution (CC-BY). Download (361kB) | Preview |
The use of animal-born sensors for location-based tracking and bio-logging in terrestrial systems has expanded dramatically in the past 10 years. This rapid expansion has generated new data on how animals interact with and respond to variation in their environment, resulting in important ecological, physiological, and evolutionary insights. Although understanding the finer details of animal locations has important management relevance, applied studies are not prominent in the movement ecology literature. This is despite the long history of applied studies of animal movement and the urgent and growing need for evidence-based conservation guidance, especially in the challenging field of human-wildlife interactions. The goal of this review is to evaluate the realized contribution of tracking-based animalmovement ecology to solving specific conservation
problems, and to identify barriers that may hinder expansion of that contribution. To do this, we (a) briefly review the history and technologies used in animal tracking and bio-logging, (b) use a series of literature searches to evaluate the frequency with which movement ecology studies are designed to solve specific conservation problems, and (c) use this information to identify challenges that may limit the applied relevance of the field of movement ecology, and to propose pathways to expand that applied relevance. Our literature review quantifies the limited extent to which research in the field of movement ecology is designed to solve specific conservation problems, but also the fact that such studies are slowly becoming more prevalent. We discuss how barriers that limit application of these principles are likely due to constraints imposed by the types of data used commonly in the field. Problems of scale mismatch, error compounding, and data
paucity all create challenges that are relevant to the field ofmovement ecology butmay be especially pertinent in applied situations. Finding solutions to these problems will create new opportunity for movement ecologists to contribute to conservation science.
Item Type: |
Journal Article (Original Article) |
---|---|
Division/Institute: |
08 Faculty of Science > Department of Biology > Institute of Ecology and Evolution (IEE) > Conservation Biology |
UniBE Contributor: |
Arlettaz, Raphaël |
Subjects: |
500 Science > 570 Life sciences; biology 500 Science > 590 Animals (Zoology) |
ISSN: |
2296-701X |
Publisher: |
Frontiers Media |
Language: |
English |
Submitter: |
Olivier Roth |
Date Deposited: |
13 Apr 2021 17:01 |
Last Modified: |
05 Dec 2022 15:49 |
Publisher DOI: |
10.3389/fevo.2019.00519 |
BORIS DOI: |
10.48350/154233 |
URI: |
https://boris.unibe.ch/id/eprint/154233 |