Variations in end-of-life practices in intensive care units worldwide (Ethicus-2): a prospective observational study.

Avidan, Alexander; Sprung, Charles L; Schefold, Joerg C; Ricou, Bara; Hartog, Christiane S; Nates, Joseph L; Jaschinski, Ulrich; Lobo, Suzana M; Joynt, Gavin M; Lesieur, Olivier; Weiss, Manfred; Antonelli, Massimo; Bülow, Hans-Henrik; Bocci, Maria G; Robertsen, Annette; Anstey, Matthew H; Estébanez-Montiel, Belén; Lautrette, Alexandre; Gruber, Anastasiia; Estella, Angel; ... (2021). Variations in end-of-life practices in intensive care units worldwide (Ethicus-2): a prospective observational study. The lancet. Respiratory medicine, 9(10), pp. 1101-1110. Elsevier 10.1016/S2213-2600(21)00261-7

[img] Text
2021_-_Avidan_-_Lancet_Respir_Med_-_PMID_34364537.pdf - Published Version
Restricted to registered users only
Available under License Publisher holds Copyright.

Download (801kB) | Request a copy

BACKGROUND

End-of-life practices vary among intensive care units (ICUs) worldwide. Differences can result in variable use of disproportionate or non-beneficial life-sustaining interventions across diverse world regions. This study investigated global disparities in end-of-life practices.

METHODS

In this prospective, multinational, observational study, consecutive adult ICU patients who died or had a limitation of life-sustaining treatment (withholding or withdrawing life-sustaining therapy and active shortening of the dying process) during a 6-month period between Sept 1, 2015, and Sept 30, 2016, were recruited from 199 ICUs in 36 countries. The primary outcome was the end-of-life practice as defined by the end-of-life categories: withholding or withdrawing life-sustaining therapy, active shortening of the dying process, or failed cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). Patients with brain death were included in a separate predefined end-of-life category. Data collection included patient characteristics, diagnoses, end-of-life decisions and their timing related to admission and discharge, or death, with comparisons across different regions. Patients were studied until death or 2 months from the first limitation decision.

FINDINGS

Of 87 951 patients admitted to ICU, 12 850 (14·6%) were included in the study population. The number of patients categorised into each of the different end-of-life categories were significantly different for each region (p<0·001). Limitation of life-sustaining treatment occurred in 10 401 patients (11·8% of 87 951 ICU admissions and 80·9% of 12 850 in the study population). The most common limitation was withholding life-sustaining treatment (5661 [44·1%]), followed by withdrawing life-sustaining treatment (4680 [36·4%]). More treatment withdrawing was observed in Northern Europe (1217 [52·8%] of 2305) and Australia/New Zealand (247 [45·7%] of 541) than in Latin America (33 [5·8%] of 571) and Africa (21 [13·0%] of 162). Shortening of the dying process was uncommon across all regions (60 [0·5%]). One in five patients with treatment limitations survived hospitalisation. Death due to failed CPR occurred in 1799 (14%) of the study population, and brain death occurred in 650 (5·1%). Failure of CPR occurred less frequently in Northern Europe (85 [3·7%] of 2305), Australia/New Zealand (23 [4·3%] of 541), and North America (78 [8·5%] of 918) than in Africa (106 [65·4%] of 162), Latin America (160 [28·0%] of 571), and Southern Europe (590 [22·5%] of 2622). Factors associated with treatment limitations were region, age, and diagnoses (acute and chronic), and country end-of-life legislation.

INTERPRETATION

Limitation of life-sustaining therapies is common worldwide with regional variability. Withholding treatment is more common than withdrawing treatment. Variations in type, frequency, and timing of end-of-life decisions were observed. Recognising regional differences and the reasons behind these differences might help improve end-of-life care worldwide.

FUNDING

None.

Item Type:

Journal Article (Original Article)

Division/Institute:

04 Faculty of Medicine > Department of Intensive Care, Emergency Medicine and Anaesthesiology (DINA) > Clinic of Intensive Care

UniBE Contributor:

Schefold, Jörg Christian

Subjects:

600 Technology > 610 Medicine & health

ISSN:

2213-2600

Publisher:

Elsevier

Language:

English

Submitter:

Jsabelle Arni

Date Deposited:

09 Sep 2021 14:53

Last Modified:

03 Oct 2021 01:33

Publisher DOI:

10.1016/S2213-2600(21)00261-7

PubMed ID:

34364537

BORIS DOI:

10.48350/158351

URI:

https://boris.unibe.ch/id/eprint/158351

Actions (login required)

Edit item Edit item
Provide Feedback