Enkling, Norbert; Nauli, Joël; Kraus, Dominik; Wittneben, Julia Gabriela; Schimmel, Martin; Abou-Ayash, Samir (2021). Short strategic implants for mandibular removable partial dentures: One-year results from a pilot randomized crossover abutment type study. Clinical oral implants research, 32(10), pp. 1176-1189. Wiley-Blackwell 10.1111/clr.13815
|
Text
clr.13815-3.pdf - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons: Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works (CC-BY-NC-ND). Download (1MB) | Preview |
OBJECTIVES
The present pilot study analyzed two abutment types (a retentive ball and a non-retentive dome) in implant-assisted removable partial dentures (IARPDs) on 6 mm short implants with respect to clinical, radiological, and patient-reported outcomes (PROs), during the first year.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Two implants were placed bilaterally in mandibular molar sites, converting existing free-end removable partial dentures (RPDs) to IARPDs. Twelve subjects were randomized to initially receive either the dome (Group A, n = 6) or the ball abutment (Group B, n = 6). After eight weeks, the abutments were exchanged. After another 8 weeks, the participants were given the choice of one of the abutments. Mean values and standard deviations (SD) were calculated, and random-effect linear regression analyses were applied to analyze marginal bone level alterations and PROs (α < .05).
RESULTS
Twelve participants were included in the study; however, one dropout occurred. Patient ratings increased significantly in both study groups. The majority of the participants (82%) ultimately chose the ball abutment. The implant survival rate was 100%, and the success rate was 90.9% twelve months after implant placement (mean peri-implant bone-loss: -1.2; SD: 0.6 mm) without a statistically significant difference between the study groups, in terms of clinical- and radiological outcomes.
CONCLUSION
Placing 6 mm short implants at mandibular molar sites of RPD wearers seems to be a viable treatment option, based on this investigation with a short-term follow-up. Although only minor differences between the two abutments were observed, patients seem to prefer the ball over the dome abutment.
Item Type: |
Journal Article (Original Article) |
---|---|
Division/Institute: |
04 Faculty of Medicine > School of Dental Medicine > Department of Reconstructive Dentistry and Gerodontology |
UniBE Contributor: |
Enkling, Norbert, Schimmel, Martin, Abou-Ayash, Samir |
Subjects: |
600 Technology > 610 Medicine & health |
ISSN: |
0905-7161 |
Publisher: |
Wiley-Blackwell |
Language: |
English |
Submitter: |
Lena Augé |
Date Deposited: |
29 Sep 2021 08:10 |
Last Modified: |
03 Nov 2024 06:52 |
Publisher DOI: |
10.1111/clr.13815 |
PubMed ID: |
34352145 |
Uncontrolled Keywords: |
OHRQoL Short implant abutment anchor bone-remodeling implant overdenture strategic implant |
BORIS DOI: |
10.48350/159261 |
URI: |
https://boris.unibe.ch/id/eprint/159261 |