Aubert, Carole E; Sussman, Jeremy B; Hofer, Timothy P; Cushman, William C; Ha, Jin-Kyung; Min, Lillian (2021). Adding a New Medication Versus Maximizing Dose to Intensify Hypertension Treatment in Older Adults : A Prospective Observational Study. Annals of internal medicine, 174(12), pp. 1666-1673. American College of Physicians 10.7326/M21-1456
Text
Aubert_AnnInternMed_2021.pdf - Published Version Restricted to registered users only Available under License Publisher holds Copyright. Download (495kB) |
BACKGROUND
There are 2 approaches to intensifying antihypertensive treatment when target blood pressure is not reached, adding a new medication and maximizing dose. Which strategy is better is unknown.
OBJECTIVE
To assess the frequency of intensification by adding a new medication versus maximizing dose, as well as the association of each method with intensification sustainability and follow-up systolic blood pressure (SBP).
DESIGN
Large-scale, population-based, retrospective cohort study. Observational data were used to emulate a target trial with 2 groups, new medication and maximizing dose, who underwent intensification of their drug regimen.
SETTING
Veterans Health Administration (2011 to 2013).
PATIENTS
Veterans aged 65 years or older with hypertension, an SBP of 130 mm Hg or higher, and at least 1 antihypertensive medication at less than the maximum dose.
MEASUREMENTS
The following 2 intensification approaches were emulated: adding a new medication, defined as a total dose increase with new medication, and maximizing dose, defined as a total dose increase without new medication. Inverse probability weighting was used to assess the observational effectiveness of the intensification approach on sustainability of intensified treatment and follow-up SBP at 3 and 12 months.
RESULTS
Among 178 562 patients, 45 575 (25.5%) had intensification by adding a new medication and 132 987 (74.5%) by maximizing dose. Compared with maximizing dose, adding a new medication was associated with less intensification sustainability (average treatment effect, -15.2% [95% CI, -15.7% to -14.6%] at 3 months and -15.1% [CI, -15.6% to -14.5%] at 12 months) but a slightly larger reduction in mean SBP (-0.8 mm Hg [CI, -1.2 to -0.4 mm Hg] at 3 months and -1.1 mm Hg [CI, -1.6 to -0.6 mm Hg] at 12 months).
LIMITATION
Observational data; largely male population.
CONCLUSION
Adding a new antihypertensive medication was less frequent and was associated with less intensification sustainability but slightly larger reductions in SBP. Trials would provide the most definitive support for our findings.
PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE
National Institute on Aging and Veterans Health Administration.
Item Type: |
Journal Article (Original Article) |
---|---|
Division/Institute: |
04 Faculty of Medicine > Department of General Internal Medicine (DAIM) > Clinic of General Internal Medicine 04 Faculty of Medicine > Medical Education > Institute of General Practice and Primary Care (BIHAM) |
UniBE Contributor: |
Aubert, Carole Elodie |
Subjects: |
600 Technology > 610 Medicine & health 300 Social sciences, sociology & anthropology > 360 Social problems & social services |
ISSN: |
0003-4819 |
Publisher: |
American College of Physicians |
Funders: |
[4] Swiss National Science Foundation |
Language: |
English |
Submitter: |
Andrea Flükiger-Flückiger |
Date Deposited: |
14 Oct 2021 19:06 |
Last Modified: |
05 Dec 2022 15:53 |
Publisher DOI: |
10.7326/M21-1456 |
PubMed ID: |
34606315 |
BORIS DOI: |
10.48350/159998 |
URI: |
https://boris.unibe.ch/id/eprint/159998 |