Would you Bribe your Lecturer? A Quasi-experimental Study on Burnout and Bribery in Higher Education

Weißmüller, Kristina S.; De Waele, Lode (2021). Would you Bribe your Lecturer? A Quasi-experimental Study on Burnout and Bribery in Higher Education. Research in Higher Education, 63(5), pp. 768-796. Springer 10.1007/s11162-021-09669-1

[img]
Preview
Text
Weissmueller_DeWaele_2021_RiHE.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons: Attribution (CC-BY).

Download (1MB) | Preview

Bribery is a complex and critical issue in higher education (HE), causing severe economic and societal harm. Traditionally, most scholarship on HE corruption has focused on institutional factors in developing countries and insights into the psychological and motivational factors that drive HE bribery on the micro-level mechanisms are virtually non-existent. To close this research gap, this study investigates the connection between study-related burnout and university students’ willingness to offer bribes to their lecturers to pass important exams. Conducting a vignette-based quasi-experimental replication study with 624 university students in Germany, Belgium, and the Netherlands we find that university students in three countries differentiate sharply between different shades of bribery and that a majority accept using emotional influence tactics to pass (failed) exams. In contrast, offering a helping hand or money (i.e., darker shades of bribery) to their lecturer was less acceptable. Study-related burnout is associated with a higher likelihood of engaging in these darker shades of bribery and students’ commitment to the public interest is but a weak factor in preventing unethical behavior. In summary, this study provides solid empirical evidence that university students are likely to use emotional influence tactics violating both the ethical codes of conduct and the formalized bureaucratic procedures of HE examination, particularly if they suffer from study-related burnout. However, the accelerating effect of burnout on bribery is conditional in that it only holds for darker shades of bribery. HE institutions may benefit from implementing the four-eye principle and from launching awareness campaigns that enable lecturers to better recognize these tactics and engage students in creating a transparent environment for testing, grading, and collaboration that is resistant to bribery.

Item Type:

Journal Article (Original Article)

Division/Institute:

11 Centers of Competence > KPM Center for Public Management

UniBE Contributor:

Weissmüller, Kristina Sabrina

Subjects:

300 Social sciences, sociology & anthropology > 330 Economics
300 Social sciences, sociology & anthropology > 350 Public administration & military science
300 Social sciences, sociology & anthropology > 370 Education

ISSN:

0361-0365

Publisher:

Springer

Language:

English

Submitter:

Kristina Sabrina Weissmüller

Date Deposited:

21 Dec 2021 12:12

Last Modified:

02 Mar 2023 23:35

Publisher DOI:

10.1007/s11162-021-09669-1

Uncontrolled Keywords:

Higher education; Bribery; Burnout; Commitment to public interest

BORIS DOI:

10.48350/161834

URI:

https://boris.unibe.ch/id/eprint/161834

Actions (login required)

Edit item Edit item
Provide Feedback