Changes in communication of end-of-life decisions in European ICUs from 1999 to 2016 (Ethicus-2) - a prospective observational study.

Hartog, Christiane S; Maia, Paulo A; Ricou, Bara; Danbury, Chris; Galarza, Laura; Schefold, Joerg C; Soreide, Eldar; Bocci, Maria G; Pohrt, Anne; Sprung, Charles L; Avidan, Alexander (2022). Changes in communication of end-of-life decisions in European ICUs from 1999 to 2016 (Ethicus-2) - a prospective observational study. Journal of critical care, 68, pp. 83-88. Elsevier 10.1016/j.jcrc.2021.12.006

[img] Text
2021_-_Hartog_-_J_Crit_Care_-_PMID_34952475.pdf - Published Version
Restricted to registered users only
Available under License Publisher holds Copyright.

Download (275kB)

PURPOSE

We investigated changes in communication practice about end-of-life decisions in European ICUs over 16 years.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This prospectively planned secondary analysis of two observational studies in 22 European ICUs in 1999-2000 (Ethicus-1) and 2015-16 (Ethicus-2) included consecutive patients who died or with limitation of life-sustaining therapy. ICUs were grouped into North, Central and South European regions.

RESULTS

A total 4592 patients were included in 1999-2000 (n = 2807) and 2015-16 (n = 1785). Information about patient wishes increased overall (from 25.4% [570] to 51.1% [840]) and in all regions (42% to 61% [North], 22% to 56% [Central] and 20% to 32% [South], all p < 0.001). Discussions of treatment limitations with patients or families increased overall (66.0% to 76.1%) and in Northern and Central Europe (87% to 94% and 75% to 82.2%, respectively, all p < 0.001) but not in the South. Strongest predictor for discussions was the region (North>Central>South) followed by patient decision-making capacity.

CONCLUSION

End-of-life decisions are increasingly discussed but communication practices vary by region and follow a North-South gradient. Despite increased availability of information, patient preferences still remain unknown in every second patient. This calls for increased efforts to assess patient preference in advance and make them known to ICU clinicians.

Item Type:

Journal Article (Original Article)

Division/Institute:

04 Faculty of Medicine > Department of Intensive Care, Emergency Medicine and Anaesthesiology (DINA) > Clinic of Intensive Care

UniBE Contributor:

Schefold, Jörg Christian

Subjects:

600 Technology > 610 Medicine & health

ISSN:

0883-9441

Publisher:

Elsevier

Language:

English

Submitter:

Isabelle Arni

Date Deposited:

18 Jan 2022 13:40

Last Modified:

05 Dec 2022 16:00

Publisher DOI:

10.1016/j.jcrc.2021.12.006

PubMed ID:

34952475

Uncontrolled Keywords:

Communication Death Intensive Care Units Withholding treatment

BORIS DOI:

10.48350/163592

URI:

https://boris.unibe.ch/id/eprint/163592

Actions (login required)

Edit item Edit item
Provide Feedback