Coverage with evidence development schemes for medical devices in Europe: characteristics and challenges

Federici, Carlo; Reckers-Droog, Vivian; Ciani, Oriana; Dams, Florian; Grigore, Bogdan; Kaló, Zoltán; Kovács, Sándor; Shatrov, Kosta; Brouwer, Werner; Drummond, Michael (2021). Coverage with evidence development schemes for medical devices in Europe: characteristics and challenges. European journal of health economics, 22(8), pp. 1253-1273. Springer 10.1007/s10198-021-01334-9

Preview

Text Federici2021_Article_CoverageWithEvidenceDevelopmen.pdf - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons: Attribution (CC-BY). Download (1MB) | Preview

Objectives
Medical devices are potentially good candidates for coverage with evidence development (CED) schemes, as clinical data at market entry are often sparse and (cost-)effectiveness depends on real-world use. The objective of this research was to explore the diffusion of CED schemes for devices in Europe, and the factors that favour or hamper their utilization.

Methods
We conducted structured interviews with 25 decision-makers from 22 European countries to explore the characteristics of existing CED programmes for devices, and how decision makers perceived 13 pre-identified challenges associated with initiating and operating CED schemes for devices. We also collected data on individual schemes that were either initiated or still ongoing in the last 5 years.

Results
We identified seven countries with CED programmes for devices and 78 ongoing schemes. The characteristics of CED programmes varied across countries, including eligibility criteria, roles and responsibilities of stakeholders, funding arrangements, and type of decisions being contemplated at the outset of each scheme. We observed a high variability in how decision makers perceived CED-related challenges possibly reflecting country-specific arrangements and different experiences with CED. One general finding across all countries was that relatively little attention was paid to the evaluation of schemes, both during and at their completion.

Conclusions
CED programmes for devices with different characteristics exist in Europe. Decision-makers’ perceptions differ on the challenges associated with these schemes. More exchange of knowledge and experience will help decision makers anticipate the likely challenges in CED schemes for devices, and to learn from good practices existing elsewhere.

Interest & Impact

Downloads

41 since deposited on 09 Mar 2022
20 in the past 12 months

Citations

5 Citations in Web of Science ®
6 Citations in Scopus

Search

in Google Scholar™

Services

Actions (login required)

Edit item

Actions (login required)

Edit item